Who is Tarkan? He takes lots of photos. Some bridges and houses. Some pretty women. Lots of really cute cats.
Whenever I google one, they both come up.
How is that even possible?
Huh, even google's not sure anymore.
Who is Tarkan? He takes lots of photos. Some bridges and houses. Some pretty women. Lots of really cute cats.
Maybe they found two people's DNA on the body (the friend?). One of the DNA was Taylans, but they don't know if it was from the night before or the killing....and they are trying to figure out who the other person is by making Taylan believe he is not a suspect?
Ahem, it's not unusual for many cities
Bourne I Respectfully disagree. Except for the age difference they look like they could be the same person.
I agree, taking together all this circumstantial evidence looks very very fishy. And if Taylan is not the killer, he has to be the most unlucky person on the planet right now,
But if you assume DNA is true, how do you get over the fact that the DNA does not match? It has to be more than simply the LE is trying to throw us off...
I mean, if the DNA matched, and given ALL the circumstantial evidence mentioned above, they would have arrested Tayan by now, right? so the DNA must not match.
How does one make out a viable theory about Taylan w his DNA not matching? Also, recall LE says there is killer DNA so it is not just the case that Taylan killed her without leaving DNA
I could see there could be theories, either you do not believe police when they say No DNA match (problem here is why disbelief of police on this? If they had DNA match they would have arrested him so there must not be a match). Another theory could be that Taylan arranged the killing but he did not himself do it. Another theory could be that he planted the DNA of another (one poster had this theory but others did not agree). All at the same time, he wiped away all his DNA and planted another's (what LE claimed Amanda Knox did - wiped away all her DNA but leave Rudy's - impossible to do, IMO!).
Maybe there are other theories too. But I do not think any of these other theories are very strong.
On the one hand there is very strong circumstantial evidence against Taylan, we know that, we debated that for days, we all know Taylan is the number one suspect and there is a strong circumstantial case,
But how reconcile that w fact that his DNA is not a match? If glove don't fit, have to acquit right? If no DNA match, and taking LE at word there is in fact killer DNA, how could Taylan be guilty? No one addresses this question. How could Taylan be killer w no DNA match? His DNA cannot be a match or else they would have arrested him...
One poster mentioned above too re: Taylan and Amman and landlord's kids reading this someday. That is why I think we really need to be careful in accusing people.this can affect people's lives, their jobs, etc.
There is extremely strong evidence against Taylan. But there is compelling forensic evidence too that not only suggests he did not do it, but, in a court of law, would be sufficient to actually clear him. We hear all the time about foreign DNA clearing some poor guy locked away for 40 years for a crime they did not do. It would be the same here; the presence of foreign DNA that police say is killers and does not match Taylan gives us reasonable doubt. That fact alone could actually clear him, no matter what the circumstantial evidence suggests: if cop says killer DNA and it ain't yours, there could not be an arrest let alone conviction.
So how get over the fact that there is exculpatory evidence here? How could Taylan be the killer when his DNA is not a match?
Who is Tarkan? He takes lots of photos. Some bridges and houses. Some pretty women. Lots of really cute cats.
No no you are confused. Taylan's name was @taylloo . He changed it to @sahhrudd
@tarkan1971 is tarkan, NOT taylan he has always had that as his name, and hasn't changed it.
You are mixing up two separate people.
I remember a press report that Taylan was the moniker LE used to protect his identity and his real name is Tarkan? Correct me if I'm wrong please.![]()
That's what I thought too. Perhaps Taylan's friend groped Sarai and she scratched him so she got the friend's DNA under her fingernails. Or maybe there was a mix of prints under her nails because there was more than one person she struggled against and LE managed to collect only trace (unusable) levels of mixed DNA.
I'd really like to know whether Taylan had actually taken a friend to meet with Sarai the day she was killed. We need confirmation.
I shall not forget your forum handle while writing my suicide note. My sleuthing virtue has been insulted. I cannot live with this agony.![]()
Did you see the first frame? He's like Rambo.
These kinda guys would consider it an insult to use pebble stone to kill someone.
He's not our guy.
I'm starting to think you are Taylan.![]()
Well, crimes of passion are chaotic. Maybe there wasn't an intent to kill, who knows? Let's not assume murder was premeditated.
Sorry I thought I heard a knock on my door.
Well you know he has been really forcing the random attack angle.
Huh? Are you saying you're going to incriminate me when you take your own life? :waitasec:
If Taylan and/or Sarai wore gloves and they struggled, whatever DNA she got under her nails may not be from her murderer.
So who exactly is Tarkan in relation to Sarai? I forgot if I ever knew.
Ok. Why do you think TK is gay? Besides the earring thing which has been done to death and stopped really being an accurate way to "cruise" men like 25 years ago?
And why on earth would there not be a WC for women in a bar in Istanbul?
Well you know he has been really forcing the random attack angle.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.