IBsleuthin
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2008
- Messages
- 2,151
- Reaction score
- 36
Can a lawyer instruct the client to just plead guilty in order to prevent a trial that is obviously guilty?
Is that legal?
Is that legal?
Can a lawyer instruct the client to just plead guilty in order to prevent a trial that is obviously guilty?
Is that legal?
Can a lawyer instruct the client to just plead guilty in order to prevent a trial that is obviously guilty?
Is that legal?
I think any good attorney would advise a client what all their options were and possible results of each, and then let client decide. I have had to hire an attorney once in the past (over a lovely neighborhood HOA dispute), while we had grounds to sue and he'd have likely made more money that way, he helped us understand and exhaust every possible avenue before it came to that.
So, not exactly the same situation, but yes I think an attorney can certainly advise for and against certain approaches and explain why....but I think the ultimate decision is the client's.
Oh, gitana1, where are you?
This is correct, there are exceptions, but a good lawyer with lots of experience often knows the potential outcome of different approaches in their jurisdiction. A lot of it depends on who the judge is, what the person is charged with, results of an examining (preliminary) trial, etc.
For example, it helps to know that the judge you will be in front of is a former police officer, or a former prosecutor, etc, when you set out possibilities for your clients. It also helps to know the general outcomes for various trials in the past.
Posting a thread to comment on, question, or criticize moderator or administrator action is not appropriate in a public forum. Please utilize the board’s Private Message function, or email, staff if you wish to discuss these issues. As long as you bring up your concerns maturely and civilly to the moderator or administrator in question, we will do our best to address your concerns fairly and promptly.
So, how about them Yankees? Don't know how to smiley emoticon here
Another officer then shot Holder in the head.
That officer is a hero IMO. Didn't an original MSM say that three shots were fired? If Officer Lodatto tackled TH when he pulled the gun and TH shot the officer in the groin and the officer shot him from some odd angle, this could explain why TH wasn't killed outright. However, if the second shot came from another officer, you would think they would aim for the head due to the struggle which would definitely result in brain damage.
ETA: just read the article a second time:
How would he hit him in a way to not cause brain damage?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.