Relatively OT, but does anybody know if it's protocol to shoot to kill in a situation like that? Is that ever protocol, or does LE always err on the side of "incapacitate only," barring bad aim?
I would assume it's in the state's best interest to keep the suspect alive, but I guess in situations like that the life of LE is prioritized and the only way to truly guarantee that is to kill the shooter..
I guess I'm just curious if TH's injury was a result of a missed fatal shot, or the result of a perfect shot (in that it didn't kill).