defense hypothetical: someone on spectrum, previously diagnosed as autistic (EXCEPT HE WASN'T), route change at work, familial stressors at home. what if a child saw that person doing a hit of cocaine? So the person assumes child saw them, abducts and murders her, how would theory of mind factor into that scenario and those decisions made.
Theory of mind is about understanding someone else's perception of you. If you kidnap and kill a child because you perceived that that child saw you using cocaine, that shows a deficit of theory of mind.
Defense: is this a big reaction to a little problem?
A: that would fit.
So maybe it is also Athena's fault for maybe seeing him doing coke.
This is infuriating, I have been frustrated during a lot of trials but I never imagined I could be this frustrated with a trial where GUILT has already been admitted.