OMG.....your client's childhood , cudnt read without tears....Off topic but wanted to share…
(Some details changed)
Many years ago I did a court riskassessment on a young man (diagnosed PTSD, ADHD and Autism) who was arrested at age 18 for molesting a 9 year old girl whom he was asked to babysit by a family friend.
During this assessment, I learned that his mother attempted suicide while pregnant with him by poisoning herself. He had to be immediately removed from her womb 7 weeks early and receive a full blood transfusion. He grew up in rural poverty with his depressed mother, a couple siblings and a stepfather. The stepfather sexually abused all the children and would force them to watch violent pornography. He would punish the children by making them kneel on rice for hours until their knees bled. He strangled several family cats to death in front of my client and eventually shot himself in the face with a shotgun in the home. After, my client ended up living in a car with his mom until he found her unconscious following a suicide attempt. He was then sent to live with his father and uncle for the remainder of his adolescence up until his arrest. As a teen, he struggled greatly socially and expressed interest in sex and dating but did not have the age appropriate skills to connect with female peers. His father and uncle were later arrested for uploading child pornography. Not all of this was self-reported during the assessment but there was documentation of all of it.
I share this because while mental health history doesn’t excuse behavior (rare exceptions) it can begin to explain behavior when viewed in the proper context. Did we really expect this individual to grow up “normal?”
The dots are not being connected for me here. I think it’s very human to fill in the gaps the defense is leaving wide open with “he’s just an evil person” (which is where I’m at right now tbh unless they give me more to mull over).
Sorry for the essay but ya’ll are great critical thinkers and I figured you’d find it interesting.
I’m shocked the judge is allowing her to testify. No personal experience, but global. What does that mean?State calls the Defense's bluff. Defense wants her testify to her expertise but without presenting her as an expert.
Kidnapping and sexually assaulting a 7 year old should be the death penalty, IMO. No matter if the victim is not murdered. IMOOMG.....your client's childhood , cudnt read without tears....
As bad as kidnapping and sexually molesting athena was, i think if TH had dropped her back in an hour at the end of her driveway being incapable of murder - his crime would have been much lesser in the eyes of law and prob not DP level - although rape of a minor below 8 is DP in florida as we saw in the Stephen S case?
Murdering her after molesting her was , what purpose did it serve, unless he enjoyed that as well? I mean, with therapy and healing, eventually she could have at least lived and lived a normal life. Dont think Im articulating well what I am trying to say here. If murdering her was so she could not report him /identify him to cops , then it served no purpose at all
At first I thought this defense was the best they had to work with but......now, I have taken an opposite view and believe there is a good possibility that the strategy is purposefully poor and non-relevant so as to provide TH with grounds for an ineffective counsel appeal. I believe his attorneys know he will be sentenced to death and have prepared for that very thing so they are setting the grounds for the appeal. There have been no records produced to back the defense claims of ADHA, FAS, etc and these witnesses are contributing nothing substantial or relevant when describing his first 2 years of life. The experts aren't really experts and some haven't even spoken with TH. Their claims of 24 times higher lead level with an instrument not approved for use with humans is flat out absurd. Is this because there's nothing there to begin with or is it because what is there has been intentionally suppressed in favor of an 'after-the-sentencing' chance at a sentence reversal?? IDK....what do you think?I wonder if the defense are doing a deliberately poor job just because they have to do something. They aren’t really providing any defense for what he’s done, are they?!
Everything today has just been irrelevant IMO.State objects.
Judge sustains.
Defense asks to be heard.
Judge: no, ma'am.
I just think this is all they have. TH is evil. No reason. IMHOAt first I thought this defense was the best they had to work with but......now, I have taken an opposite view and believe there is a good possibility that the strategy is purposefully poor and non-relevant so as to provide TH with grounds for an ineffective counsel appeal. I believe his attorneys know he will be sentenced to death and have prepared for that very thing so they are setting the grounds for the appeal. There have been no records produced to back the defense claims of ADHA, FAS, etc and these witnesses are contributing nothing substantial or relevant when describing his first 2 years of life. The experts aren't really experts and some haven't even spoken with TH. Their claims of 24 times higher lead level with an instrument not approved for use with humans is flat out absurd. Is this because there's nothing there to begin with or is it because what is there has been intentionally suppressed in favor of an 'after-the-sentencing' chance at a sentence reversal?? IDK....what do you think?
She sounds unsure and uneducated on what they are asking her. IMODefense attorney, laugh laugh laugh
This witness doesn't even know when she would have worked with TH, which grade level.
Probably so he's not recognized and if he has any clients they won't run the other way as fast as they can. mooI tuned out when the babysitter cousin started talking about th pooping coins too
why is Mr weebles on screen now also blurred ?