Seems to me that the point is, EA left the apartment angry, with CM.. nothing confusing about that to me...
It still baffles me that NO ONE was concerned for her welfare when she left with an angry, lecherous, sexually frustrated Enrique. MOO
Seems to me that the point is, EA left the apartment angry, with CM.. nothing confusing about that to me...
Defense could say that when they got to the garage, they were both attacked by a third party. EA got his marks and wounds from the attack at this point or later. Or EA was not attacked, just she was but he was threatened to not do anything as the person attacked her. The attacker put CM in the trunk and put EA either there or in the back seat (regarding eA see previous note). He didn't tell police this because one, who would believe him. Two, the person threatened his family and/or him. The third party drove away, as we have heard the video is grainy of the car driving out and they can't make out the driver.
The prosecution has to prove that EA put her IN the trunk. I can see the defense casting doubt or at least they should that someone else did do it. Considering MANY of us believe that someone else was involved, I believe a jury is also going to have some doubts.
It still baffles me that NO ONE was concerned for her welfare when she left with an angry, lecherous, sexually frustrated Enrique. MOO
If they have video of them parking next to each other and walking away they have video of exactly what happened in that garage! Right?
I think they only know they parked next to each other by what someone has TOLD LE
I don't think they were seen parking JUST SEEN entering
They were probably too high to be concerned....
They were probably too high to be concerned....
Defense could say that when they got to the garage, they were both attacked by a third party. EA got his marks and wounds from the attack at this point or later. Or EA was not attacked, just she was but he was threatened to not do anything as the person attacked her. The attacker put CM in the trunk and put EA either there or in the back seat (regarding eA see previous note). He didn't tell police this because one, who would believe him. Two, the person threatened his family and/or him. The third party drove away, as we have heard the video is grainy of the car driving out and they can't make out the driver.
The prosecution has to prove that EA put her IN the trunk. I can see the defense casting doubt or at least they should that someone else did do it. Considering MANY of us believe that someone else was involved, I believe a jury is also going to have some doubts.
Good point.
O/T but are DFW peeps enjoying the snow?
Hmmm.. having served on a felony jury before, personally I would find that far-fetched. The prosecution would probably destroy that theory, even with just the evidence we currently know... JMO!!
Thank you. Wow. I have to ask.... WHY was the home not searched?Frisson, are we sure they searched her home?? I don't ever remember hearing that? It would be very odd to me if they did not search her home.
If I ever go missing make sure the police do a thorough search of my house!!
It is far fetched that someone they know could be in the garage waiting for them? It took them 20 mins to get there according to the VIs. I could drive places in less than 20. A guest could have texted someone and said, "they left." Someone could have drove there. Walked there. Casting doubt is the name of the defenses game. I could think of SO MANY ideas. Not in the mood to post them all because all i will hear is not possible, no way, and he put her IN the trunk. I explore a lot because where is Christina?
They were probably too high to be concerned....
Thank you. Wow. I have to ask.... WHY was the home not searched?
Seriously?!!!! Omg......
Defense could say that when they got to the garage, they were both attacked by a third party. EA got his marks and wounds from the attack at this point or later. Or EA was not attacked, just she was but he was threatened to not do anything as the person attacked her. The attacker put CM in the trunk and put EA either there or in the back seat (regarding eA see previous note). He didn't tell police this because one, who would believe him. Two, the person threatened his family and/or him. The third party drove away, as we have heard the video is grainy of the car driving out and they can't make out the driver.
The prosecution has to prove that EA put her IN the trunk. I can see the defense casting doubt or at least they should that someone else did do it. Considering MANY of us believe that someone else was involved, I believe a jury is also going to have some doubts.
Anybody could have put her in his trunk, maybe when he wasn't looking. Everybody lies, that's not a crime. Perhaps the drug cartel kingpin that orchestrated it is threatening to tell EAs parent about his crack addiction.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.