SS, with all due respect I stand by my statement that there is no positive benefit to publishing a map of where they have searched, other than to satisfy curiosity of those playing along at home. :takeabow:In fact, just the opposite! To address the justifications you mentioned:
(a) The landowner excuse is just wrong, since I (and every other local landowner) already knows whether or not our land has been searched: either they asked for permission and searched, or they didn't ask and didn't search. No mystery. You don't have permission to scour non-public land without permission in Texas. Ever. (You can legally get shot, too.) (b) The family doesn't release their map of where they've searched because it would serve no beneficial purpose to do so. They already guide the searchers, and they know where they have searched. They have no desire to release info that might somehow be used to benefit EA and help him wriggle out of paying for his horrendous crimes against Christina. (c) Your assertion that maximizing the chances for a conviction is NOT a priority may be how you look at things, and is certainly an idea that EA's defense team loves, but it is not an idea that the family or LE share (and their thinking is all that really matters). Neither would ever consider doing ANYTHING to lessen the odds for the easiest conviction for the longest term, so that EA will get locked away EA for good for what he did to Christina, and where he can never prey on an innocent victim again.
Most importantly on that last point, the best route to finding Christina is not providing a map that might help EA, but just the opposite: increase the certainty that he's going to be locked away forever. If anything will get him to talk and tell where he put her, it will be a sword of doom hanging over his head, and a desire to lessen the punishment that will multiply if she's found. Keep him in the dark about everything you are doing and where you are looking, so he never knows if you are close, or what tomorrow holds.