Timeline, just to keep it fresh in our memories:
Friday, 8/29/14:
1. At work (location?) until (time?) - could be verified from the boss of GE, who has been active on the PPD fb page.
2. Preparation to come to Plano/The Shops - unverifiable, unless access to text messages with friends she planned to meet (example-- "I need to shower, straighten my hair, xyz, and then I'm on my way")
3. Travel time to come to Plano/The Shops (which could be verified via NTTA on the SRT-- very unlikely that she'd take any other route if it was a direct Ft. Worth-to-Plano trip and there was no NEED to avoid cameras (as we suspect perp may have)
4. Arrival to parking garage (could be verified with cams)
5. Arrival to Henry's (are there cams there? If not, presence could be confirmed via bar-tab credit card, etc, or license scan, depending...)
Here's where things fall apart...
6, 7, 8
Gets food with friends? (Where? When? With whom? Where did we even get this idea-- the iffy article? If so, do we trust it?)
Apartment with friends? (to verify, consider what kind of evidence they'd need. DNA type stuff, like hair, wouldn't be enough-- too transferable. Even a phone ping wouldn't be enough-- could've been someone else using her phone. They'd need security footage (which there may be, at least in the parking lot) or photos (from iphones or some other tamper-proof time/date recording device) and the photos would have to depict something identifiable to the apartment in the background. The strongest evidence in this case would need to be tangible, not testimonial, since the credibility of the friends is on the iffy side because of previous transgressions with the law.
Departs apartment on foot to parking garage? (When? With whom? At what functional capacity?)
And then:
9. Enters parking garage (And???)