TX TX - Dallas, WhtFem UnkAge, UP142210, Tattoos, Jewelry, long gray hair, Found in an abandoned parking lot, Jul'24

  • #21
BBM, where are you seeing that? I can't find her postmortem interval mentioned on NamUs. I'm just seeing that she was decomposed. I doubt she was dead for super long since they could make out her tattoos.
Texas in July is pretty dry. They can sometimes do that with bodies found in dry conditions
 
  • #22
BBM, where are you seeing that? I can't find her postmortem interval mentioned on NamUs. I'm just seeing that she was decomposed. I doubt she was dead for super long since they could make out her tattoos.
I apologize, I thought I’d seen it on NamUS but I’d actually seen the estimated date of death on the Texas online unidentified database! 😅
 
  • #23
Did nobody else consider that Jack and Janet are her kids who were born same day?
 
  • #24
Did nobody else consider that Jack and Janet are her kids who were born same day?
Yeah you're right. Of course it could just be a coincidence and the meaning behind the tattoo is a whole different one, but the similarity of the names could well be an indication of Jack and Janet being twins. Which also means that the "Jacob" tattoo could stand for her third child, following the tradition of naming her kids with a name that starts with "Ja..."
 
  • #25
Could this be Antoinette Renee Childress that is also posted in this forum? The teeth do not look similar and are quite distinctive in the Jane Doe, but a lot could have happened between 2015 or when the photos of Childress were taken.
 
  • #26
Could this be Antoinette Renee Childress that is also posted in this forum? The teeth do not look similar and are quite distinctive in the Jane Doe, but a lot could have happened between 2015 or when the photos of Childress were taken.
I kind of see a resemblance in some pictures of Childress but not to the point where i would say its a match for sure. In the article of the Childress Case, her sister is mentioned. IF Childress is Jane Doe, it would be easily verifiable by contacting Childress sister and asking her if she had children/important people in her life named Jack/Janet/Jacob. Though i dont think thats the right move given the little information we have. I mean it would only be based on some kind of resemblance.
 
  • #27
Circumstances of Recovery: Unknown female found in an abandoned parking lot.
Am i the only one who thinks this is weird? When i first read it i thought it was, well, a parking lot like you would imagine it. But when u click on the google maps link it shows a parking lot or a backyard behind a house. Are the coordinates wrong? Why the hell would a body appear in ones backyard?! Judging from google street view, the house does not look like it was abandoned at all.
 
  • #28
I kind of see a resemblance in some pictures of Childress but not to the point where i would say its a match for sure. In the article of the Childress Case, her sister is mentioned. IF Childress is Jane Doe, it would be easily verifiable by contacting Childress sister and asking her if she had children/important people in her life named Jack/Janet/Jacob. Though i dont think thats the right move given the little information we have. I mean it would only be based on some kind of resemblance.
I thought about that. It would be interesting to compare the tattoos too.
 
  • #29

3 Missing Person Exclusions
1758765603768.webp
 
  • #30
I thought about that. It would be interesting to compare the tattoos too.
Yeah. I tried to find her sister on facebook but thats nearly impossible. I had the thought that - if i would've found her - i could search her facebook friends for a Janet, Jacob or Jack. But when i thought about it, i don't think that children which are now like 13 years old have a facebook account. I also thought about contacting tattoo shops in the area asking them if anyone would recognize one of her tattoos and might have payment records or something that include her name. But the tattoos were probably done way too long ago and are too generic for anyone to remember, even if you ask the same artist that did these.
I feel kind of delusional to even having ideas like that and to be honest, the chances of all that being successful are pretty much zero but we have so little information that we've got to make the most out of it.
An idea that might not be as delusional as the previous ones: Checking ancestory or other similar websites and see theres a record of twins named Jack and Janet being born on march 6th 2012. I feel like im not getting anywhere without a payed membership on ancestry and even though i think the chances of them being linked to JD are pretty high (if someone manages to find them), i think the chances of them being listed on such a website are fairly low.
 

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
145
Guests online
2,487
Total visitors
2,632

Forum statistics

Threads
632,815
Messages
18,632,130
Members
243,302
Latest member
Corgimomma
Back
Top