- Joined
- Jul 15, 2016
- Messages
- 280
- Reaction score
- 2,070
Just my own opinion, but I don't think the whole cosplay subject is even a part of this murder. I'd be absolutely shocked if the answer isn't close to home.
The driving around after the murder is so strange, especially the part about Sandusky Drive.
After the murder, this person decided to turn around to drive back past the Barraza's house, supposedly to make sure Elizabeth Barraza was dead. They do not seem to slow down much. Then they keep going all the way down Sandusky Drive passing another home surveillance camera at the corner they were supposed to turn left at to get back to Kuykendahl Road.
Instead though, this person in the truck got to the cul-de-sac at the end of Sandusky Drive and decided to go off-road into the grass. Even though they could not find their way out of the subdivision on the road, they somehow got lucky and were able to drive through grass and then merge back onto Kuykendahl Road. How they knew this exit point, but not a regular road is strange.
At the time the crime happened, even if they got to a dead end cul-de-sac, it would have been much smarter to just turn around to go back to the road you missed. Going off road into a neighbor's back yard is certainly going to be way more suspicious, in my opinion.
Even the motives behind the driving are strange, especially when you consider the Nissan Frontier Pro-4X truck was in the area hours earlier driving around the subdivision. Whoever it was, this person seems like they have a very unique way of looking at things.
In a picture, it looks like Elizabeth Barraza has a dog leash for walking the dog. What if she did not have a bag to pick up dog waste and some neighbor got angry at her. I know it sounds incredible to theorize that someone would commit murder over something like that, but with the way this person acts during the commission of the crime I have come to the conclusion that the murderer knows they are getting rid of the Nissan Frontier Pro-4X and wants to be seen by others for some reason.
I think the reason someone would want it to appear this way to others is because it makes it look like the murderer is a stranger not familiar with the Tomball neighborhood where Elizabeth Barraza lived.
Yes! I've been checking the news about her every single day since this footage was released. I do believe LE knows who did this/who all was involved. They might be tying up some loose ends and getting it ready before making an arrest or multiple. I imagine LE do not want to risk anything not convincing a jury of who is guilty, so they want this to be as damning as possible. That's my hope at least! And the movement and coverage on this as of recently, imo/moo, is indicative of LE closing in.So here we’re quickly approaching the five year mark, and no arrest(s), yet! However, keeping the faith and hope alive. Liz deserves justice.
Imo, LE, investigators, have got this, and it's only a matter of time. There is no perfect crime.
It's been nearly a month since the dash cam footage was released.
![]()
New video shows raw moments shortly after Tomball woman killed in her driveway nearly 5 years ago
Nearly five years later, Liz Barraza's murder remains unsolved despite a $50,000 reward. She was gunned down while setting up a garage sale in her Tomball driveway nearly five years ago.abc13.com
December 8, 2023
"I hope police just have something they're holding onto and getting ready to snap their jaws around it," Sergio said.
One compelling theory I've heard about this is that maybe the killer had a police scanner and in listening to the quick response they feared they'd cross paths with first responders if they exited by the normal routes. (and have their plates caught on dash cam, e.g.) so went off road to avoid the police response. This would infer some pre-planning and understanding the layout of the neighborhood.they somehow got lucky and were able to drive through grass and then merge back onto Kuykendahl Road. How they knew
I once did a deep dive into the Silk Road and the dark net, and I recall learning that in hitman situations, a photo of the victim is used to prove that a particular hitman was the one who completed the job. So if that were relevant here, the purpose of driving by again would not be to assess her condition, but rather to snap a quick picture.One compelling theory I've heard about this is that maybe the killer had a police scanner and in listening to the quick response they feared they'd cross paths with first responders if they exited by the normal routes. (and have their plates caught on dash cam, e.g.) so went off road to avoid the police response. This would infer some pre-planning and understanding the layout of the neighborhood.
In any case I don't sign onto the theory that the driver came back to the scene to "make sure she was dead", because, like you mention - they didn't really even slow down as they passed.. they couldn't possibly hope to learn anything about Liz's condition beyond what they already knew..
Does it mean, there must have been an accomplice (driver?), who enabled the killer to take photographs out of a driving car?I once did a deep dive into the Silk Road and the dark net, and I recall learning that in hitman situations, a photo of the victim is used to prove that a particular hitman was the one who completed the job. So if that were relevant here, the purpose of driving by again would not be to assess her condition, but rather to snap a quick picture.
Interesting!So if that were relevant here, the purpose of driving by again would not be to assess her condition, but rather to snap a quick picture.
think that the driving around is more likely panic and an overwhelming emotional reaction- which makes it seem as if this was personal and the driving around pre-shooting is an angry person stalking IMOThe driving around after the murder is so strange, especially the part about Sandusky Drive.
After the murder, this person decided to turn around to drive back past the Barraza's house, supposedly to make sure Elizabeth Barraza was dead. They do not seem to slow down much. Then they keep going all the way down Sandusky Drive passing another home surveillance camera at the corner they were supposed to turn left at to get back to Kuykendahl Road.
Instead though, this person in the truck got to the cul-de-sac at the end of Sandusky Drive and decided to go off-road into the grass. Even though they could not find their way out of the subdivision on the road, they somehow got lucky and were able to drive through grass and then merge back onto Kuykendahl Road. How they knew this exit point, but not a regular road is strange.
At the time the crime happened, even if they got to a dead end cul-de-sac, it would have been much smarter to just turn around to go back to the road you missed. Going off road into a neighbor's back yard is certainly going to be way more suspicious, in my opinion.
Even the motives behind the driving are strange, especially when you consider the Nissan Frontier Pro-4X truck was in the area hours earlier driving around the subdivision. Whoever it was, this person seems like they have a very unique way of looking at things.
In a picture, it looks like Elizabeth Barraza has a dog leash for walking the dog. What if she did not have a bag to pick up dog waste and some neighbor got angry at her. I know it sounds incredible to theorize that someone would commit murder over something like that, but with the way this person acts during the commission of the crime I have come to the conclusion that the murderer knows they are getting rid of the Nissan Frontier Pro-4X and wants to be seen by others for some reason.
I think the reason someone would want it to appear this way to others is because it makes it look like the murderer is a stranger not familiar with the Tomball neighborhood where Elizabeth Barraza lived.
I think it's quite likely that it was just a mistake or not well thought out decision of some sort caused by the stress and emotions of the situation. But I think that could be equally applicable to someone who did it for personal reasons or someone inexperienced who did it for money.think that the driving around is more likely panic and an overwhelming emotional reaction- which makes it seem as if this was personal and the driving around pre-shooting is an angry person stalking IMO
As Liz's family, I'm sure they are privy to more information than we know. They have been relentlessly pursuing justice for their daughter. I am inclined to go with their theory at this point. I am so sorry they are living through this nightmare. May justice be brought for LB ASAP.Robert believes Liz's killer was hired.
Did the cops specifically say that?If it is indeed a male he may be on the small side...or already owned go-go or calf-high boots in his size already.
I laughed about the part that men aren't that clever...
unless EB had an enemy who cross-dresses, or is a drag Queen, or already owns costumes it's possible...the likelihood of it being a woman with long hair in flat calf boots with yoga leggings is much more likely.
I am curious why the cops though they were go-go boots and a WIG.
Did the cops specifically say that?
I ask because there has been some details in this case that seem more like someones observation/opinion.
For instance, I have read in some articles that the killer was holding and old man mask, that they passed Liz a note, or that a man's voice is heard on the ring doorbell audio.
I don't know where the mask thing came from, its really hard to see what the shooter extends in their left hand to Liz, and I don't personally hear any audio on the doorbell camera that sounds like a man.
Our sight and hearing can deceive us at times, and be different from person to person. Just think, the "what color is the dress" meme or "do you hear yanny or laurel" audio clips.
I also think people online run with things in strange directions sometimes. For instance, "the plane lady" with "that (mfer) is NOT real!" never said she saw anything in particular, but a large portion of the comments asked "what did she see!?!" "I want to know what she saw!".
When re-looking at the timeline of her name searches on google, I wonder if something noteworthy happened in Liz's life in the first week of August 2018, half a year before her murder. While the main increase is in December and January (and I think that one lines up quite well and might be connected to the crime), there is also that first "higher" period that starts on the week of 5-11th of August. If she posted anything public or attended any noteworthy events or was in any other way "(re-/)discoverable" in early August, I'd be interested to see where these dots could connect to.
Of course, there are also other people with the same name and the searches might be related to someone else.
I also still wonder if the killer was a male or a female. When I only look at the images, I lean heavily towards a woman. When I listen to the audio, I lean towards a male. I don't think Liz appears to recognize this person initially. She might, later, though. The killing feels personal to me, I think the shooter was the person that wanted her dead. So someone Liz would not expect in the context of an early morning garage sale in Tomball, stepping out of a black truck?
MOO
When re-looking at the timeline of her name searches on google, I wonder if something noteworthy happened in Liz's life in the first week of August 2018, half a year before her murder. While the main increase is in December and January (and I think that one lines up quite well and might be connected to the crime), there is also that first "higher" period that starts on the week of 5-11th of August. If she posted anything public or attended any noteworthy events or was in any other way "(re-/)discoverable" in early August, I'd be interested to see where these dots could connect to.
Can you look at the timeline of the google searches of her address? Her employer?