FWIW there is no period after the word dead in the above quote.
Police responded to over a million violent crime calls. How many shootouts and fights would you expect to happen during a million calls? Is 600 fatalities really that surprising given that there are over 14,000 murders a year nationwide. So that is 14, 000 plus killings committed by the public,and 600 plus by the cops. Sounds about right to me, percentage wise. How can they answer violent calls without sometimes getting into violent interactions?
That means that statistically, death is a result in about ONE in every ONE THOUSAND, EIGHT HUNDRED violent crime calls. So cops answer 1, 800 calls between each one that ends in a death. That seems pretty good, imo.
Not sure how quoting statistics on total number of calls answered by LE, or mentioning hesitation by LE with an unarmed person of any color or injured people will sway public outrage when they see this guy with no shirt on, hands in the air shot by LE.
Why is the Washington Post tracking killings by LE? Are they being 'political', inciting public outrage? Are they out of line? Or are they trying to put some legitimate perspective on how LE are conducting themselves in case there is a problem to be dealt with?
After reading this today, could not help but think of the disco era song in this and other cases - Hands up, baby hands up.
Does anyone really know how many police shootings there are a year? In any case, I'm not sure what is the point of comparing police shootings to murders. Aren't the police supposed to protect the public, unlike murderers? I do agree most are probably justified (but perhaps avoidable) and with so many guns in America, I'm inclined to give police a little more leeway in making split moment decisions. But the police have a standard to uphold if they want the public to trust them. It doesn't matter if it's 100, 600, or 1500 shootings, if some appear to be unjustified - and people start to think that could happen to me or my family - that is what the public will focus on.
....This Houston shooting.... When I froze the video and went forward one frame at a time, what I saw was the man start to put his hands back down an instant before the shot rang out. ...
Does anyone really know how many police shootings there are a year? In any case, I'm not sure what is the point of comparing police shootings to murders. Aren't the police supposed to protect the public, unlike murderers? I do agree most are probably justified (but perhaps avoidable) and with so many guns in America, I'm inclined to give police a little more leeway in making split moment decisions. But the police have a standard to uphold if they want the public to trust them. It doesn't matter if it's 100, 600, or 1500 shootings, if some appear to be unjustified - and people start to think that could happen to me or my family - that is what the public will focus on.
bbm sbm Is there a handy-dandy trick for doing this ^ one frame at a time - so even a dino like me can do it on my M/S Surface tablet?
Anyone? Explanation or link? Thx in adv.
I willl explain exactly why one compares police shootings to murders. After a body is found in the street , who comes out and tries to capture the killers? The cops do. So with 15, 000 murders, and over a million violent crimes, the cops are called out to the crime scenes that many times. So they are on the front lines. And as they are walking around a crime scene trying to figure out who the guilty party is, they are at great risk of being shot. They know that. Shoot outs happen because cops are trying to detain the murderers/car jackers/armed robbers.
I do not think that most people think they will be killed by a cop. Not unless they are out on the streets doing crimes. Most people are way more afraid of gangs than they are of the cops. JMO
I willl explain exactly why one compares police shootings to murders. After a body is found in the street , who comes out and tries to capture the killers? The cops do. So with 15, 000 murders, and over a million violent crimes, the cops are called out to the crime scenes that many times. So they are on the front lines. And as they are walking around a crime scene trying to figure out who the guilty party is, they are at great risk of being shot. They know that. Shoot outs happen because cops are trying to detain the murderers/car jackers/armed robbers.
I do not think that most people think they will be killed by a cop. Not unless they are out on the streets doing crimes. Most people are way more afraid of gangs than they are of the cops. JMO
.... It doesn't matter if it's 100, 600, or 1500 shootings, if some appear to be unjustified - and people start tothink that could happen to me or my family - that is what the public will focus on.
bbm sbm Is there a handy-dandy trick for doing this ^ one frame at a time - so even a dino like me can do it on my M/S Surface tablet?
Anyone? Explanation or link? Thx in adv.
I'm not disputing the fact that police go into high risk situations and use their guns accordingly. I am saying that I don't think it's reasonable to compare murder rates and police shooting rates because there are so many different factors motivating a murder vs a police shooting. I'm not even saying that 600 is too high (maybe it is, maybe it isn't), just that the comparison percentage wise is misleading. Or do you think the rate of police shootings will only be too high when it exceeds the murder rate? What about police shootings when there is no body in the street? All I am saying is that they are not comparable statistics.
Edit: I am also saying that public perception matters more for police than murderers and criminals.