Small town,people know one another and lifestyles,have to deal with the same old problems of people's homes.The officer knew Bd,the address and her name and had obviously been there various times in that day,as he said she's been going at it all day.He expressed what anyone would be feeling,had nothing to do with his job performance as he was not on that call till he left the office.The officer wasn't on a call with the complaintant and I don't know why that call from the dispatcher to the officer in the office was even recorded.The dispatcher talks to the officers while they're out on the road on thier shifts,which you can hear.
Officers don't like domestic calls when they are the same people,same problems and they know the woman won't press charges and stays with the abuser.It takes away from real calls and people that have real problems,if you listened to a police scanner,you'd start to recognize the names,addresses,same circumstances and officers leaving with no arrests.At the same time you'll hear attempted burglaries,burglaries,assault,etc and there's only so many officers on a shift to go on the calls.The point is he went to the call,made the incident report and in one of those reports of that day it stated Hailey was also threatened.
LE questioned SA about it and he admitted he did threaten her.Why would SA admit he threatened Hailey if it wasn't written down from the officer's report?Also the 911 calls were denied,said they were about a debit card and Hailey wasn't threatened,when the report stated otherwise.These inconsistencies are what LE is talking about,if it hadn't been written down by someone else,I doubt it would have come out.