southcitymom
Well-Known Member
I am having a liittle trouble understanding why this mom is being crucified- without any real details being placed in front of us- the statement about a teacher reporting sexual abuse, is nothing more than gossip, imo- IF__IF the mother knew there were problems, then yes- she is as guilty as he is-- but RIGHT now, I dont see how we can be so judgementall-- yes, there are woman who put themselves above their children, but I think they are a very small minority- I dont think a man or woman should have to be "mateless" after a divorce- if a mother picks a "scum bag" after a divorce, I would guess there was a good chacne the original husband wasnt too much better- I dont think someone goes from happy home, good marriage, and family to a sexual, physical abuser--but - jmo--
Like everything else, it's a case-by-case basis. Fathers harm, abuse, and murder their own children at least as much as live-in boyfriends do, so I think it's unfair to make generalizations about the subject.
It's all well and good to say that Moms with kids who make questionable boyfriend/husband decisions should put their children first (and, of course, they should), but most Moms that bring inappropriate men into their kid's lives aren't really capable of making great decisions. In many instances, I would wager that it was a bad decision for them to have even had the kids they are now supposed to care for and put first....to all of the sudden expect them to develop sound life skills just because they had a baby is optimistic to the point of foolishness, IMHO.
My mother was so desperate to be married and have a man, that she continually sold her young daughters out to achieve that end. She still does to this day, but we are grown now and not so vulnerable. Lucky for me, I had an extremely stable father, so that - to an extent - balanced out the insanity of my Mom's choices.
Now - my Mom wasn't a good mother in this regard. But frankly, it's all she was capable of being. She was raised to believe she was nothing without a man and she bought that tale hook, line and sinker and she just never had the strength to change that about herself.
I think women who seem to put their domestic life (either husband or boyfriend) above the welfare of their childen justify their choices a million different ways ("it's better if I stay with him and they have a father;" "he makes money and we will be on the streets without him;" "he might be hard on me but he would never hurt them;" and the ever-popular 'he really love me/us" etc..etc...etc...) just as we all justify our choices and feel like they are the right choices.
I think it's rare that a women thinks "Well he's beating my son and touching my daughter inappropriately and there's kiddie




More often, they are ignorant (sometimes even willfully so) of what is really going on. Should these women be punished when their child ends up dead. For me, it depends 100% on the individual circumstances. In some cases, yes. In some cases, no. In some cases, they are just as much victims of the man as the children are.
In the case we are looking at on this thread, there is no sound reason to say this mother of a dead 6-year-old is at fault and should be punished.
I know TOS at Websleuths says we are not to speak ill of victims, but I guess who is a victim is always in the eye of the beholder because I regularly see grieving parents brutalized on threads here before anything resembling a full picture has been revealed.