Identified! TX - Huntsville, 'Walker County Jane Doe', WhtFem 14-16, 91UFTX, Nov'80 Sherry Ann Jarvis

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #2,201
I think it's worth a shot contacting the Esquire Inn and the Western Lodge. It never hurts to inquire. Has the older brother contacted anyone yet?

That hotel is still there in Beeville I googled it...but if you look thru photo gallery, no mention or picture of a pool and one of the stories mentioned talks of the 2 girls becoming friends and swimming alot in pool. But maybe pool was removed? I believe the key is the couple she said she was staying with. Why did they not come forth...unless they are the ones who murdered her???
 
  • #2,202
That hotel is still there in Beeville I googled it...but if you look thru photo gallery, no mention or picture of a pool and one of the stories mentioned talks of the 2 girls becoming friends and swimming alot in pool. But maybe pool was removed? I believe the key is the couple she said she was staying with. Why did they not come forth...unless they are the ones who murdered her???

Here's the street-view of the Esquire Inn.

https://www.google.com/maps/place/E...x8668015646de4915:0xfc420fe812433709?hl=en-us

The fenced-in area in the center of the parking lot appears to be what used to be a swimming pool. Looks like the pool was filled in with dirt.
 
  • #2,203
Is water restrictions why they got rid of the pool?
 
  • #2,204
  • #2,205
Is water restrictions why they got rid of the pool?

I would suspect that pool maintenance is too expensive, given that it is such a low-budget motel.
 
  • #2,206
I would suspect that pool maintenance is too expensive, given that it is such a low-budget motel.

Liability insurance rates go way up with a pool as well.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • #2,207
If you look at the satellite view on Google Maps, you can clearly see the 'rounded rectangle' shape of what used to be the pool.
I went through the historical satellite images, which goes back to 1998. It looks like it's been filled in since at least then.
 
  • #2,208
Found something interesting earlier while looking through MPs to match to another Jane Doe. Melanie Flynn, if you think away all the make up she does resemble Walker County Jane Doe. Though, I think Jane Doe was much younger, but I'm no expert of course. Anyway, what I found interesting is that in one of Melanie's pictures she's wearing what seems to be the exact same necklace Jane Doe was found wearing. Could it be that they got it from the same place? It looks more like something you would buy on a market instead of a big multinational (but then I wasn't around in the 70's-80's yet so I could be wrong).

7828
91UFTX6_LARGE.jpg
 
  • #2,209
Found something interesting earlier while looking through MPs to match to another Jane Doe. Melanie Flynn, if you think away all the make up she does resemble Walker County Jane Doe. Though, I think Jane Doe was much younger, but I'm no expert of course. Anyway, what I found interesting is that in one of Melanie's pictures she's wearing what seems to be the exact same necklace Jane Doe was found wearing. Could it be that they got it from the same place? It looks more like something you would buy on a market instead of a big multinational (but then I wasn't around in the 70's-80's yet so I could be wrong).

7828
91UFTX6_LARGE.jpg

They both have DNA in CODIS. From what I understand they would have automatically been compared.
 
  • #2,210
Interesting story...the necklace is a very sharp find....both have dentals. Melanie Flynn has in Namus a very explicit description of her dentals, it doesn't have to be that hard to compare...
 
  • #2,211
Found something interesting earlier while looking through MPs to match to another Jane Doe. Melanie Flynn, if you think away all the make up she does resemble Walker County Jane Doe. Though, I think Jane Doe was much younger, but I'm no expert of course. Anyway, what I found interesting is that in one of Melanie's pictures she's wearing what seems to be the exact same necklace Jane Doe was found wearing. Could it be that they got it from the same place? It looks more like something you would buy on a market instead of a big multinational (but then I wasn't around in the 70's-80's yet so I could be wrong).

7828
91UFTX6_LARGE.jpg
Is the necklace in the recon photo drawn exactly like the actual necklace? If so, I don't think it's a match, based on the point where the chain meets the pendant being different styles. JMO.

Sent from my SM-T350 using Tapatalk
 
  • #2,212
Is the necklace in the recon photo drawn exactly like the actual necklace? If so, I don't think it's a match, based on the point where the chain meets the pendant being different styles. JMO.

Sent from my SM-T350 using Tapatalk

All depictions of the necklace, including both NCMEC and Karen Taylor's drawing, show the chain meeting it at a single point.

We can't make too much out of someone having a similar necklace, especially if the rectangular type was popular around that time.
 
  • #2,213
They both have DNA in CODIS. From what I understand they would have automatically been compared.

Yes, ditto this. They will already have been ruled out.
 
  • #2,214
Hello, I've just joined the forum, albeit I've been following this thread for quite a while.
I have a question in mind. If we assume that this young girl was a native Texan & U.S. citizen, what kind of official documents must she have had back in 1980? And what official records must the state authorities have had about her those days? I'm thinking about for example a birth certificate, ID card, social security number etc... Sorry if this is a stupid question, I'm from Central Europe and not really familiar with how things go in the United States (also sorry for my English).
 
  • #2,215
Hello, I've just joined the forum, albeit I've been following this thread for quite a while.
I have a question in mind. If we assume that this young girl was a native Texan & U.S. citizen, what kind of official documents must she have had back in 1980? And what official records must the state authorities have had about her those days? I'm thinking about for example a birth certificate, ID card, social security number etc... Sorry if this is a stupid question, I'm from Central Europe and not really familiar with how things go in the United States (also sorry for my English).

She would have most likely had a birth certificate.
Depending on her age, she may have had a driver's license.
She may have had a social security card, depending on whether or not she had a job or her parents applied for one, because I don't think they were automatically issued at birth back then, like they do now.
She could have had a passport if she ever traveled.
She may have had a school ID, if her school issued them.
Or, she could have had nothing but a birth certificate. It really depends on her background.
 
  • #2,216
Hello, I've just joined the forum, albeit I've been following this thread for quite a while.
I have a question in mind. If we assume that this young girl was a native Texan & U.S. citizen, what kind of official documents must she have had back in 1980? And what official records must the state authorities have had about her those days? I'm thinking about for example a birth certificate, ID card, social security number etc... Sorry if this is a stupid question, I'm from Central Europe and not really familiar with how things go in the United States (also sorry for my English).

Hi Qwertz, Welcome! :welcome:

Most people born in the US during her life would have birth records on file somewhere, however there are some small groups who do not register their children's birth with the government at all. Possibly she would have a SSN, but only if her parents or guardians applied for one. Back then it was not always applied for at birth. She would most likely only have an ID card if she had learned to drive and had her driver's license or if her parents applied for a passport or state ID card for another reason.

I'm not sure if you are asking if she was required to carry any documents. If that is what you are asking, the answer is, no she would not need any type of documents to move freely in the state of Texas or even to travel from different US states.
 
  • #2,217
Hello, I've just joined the forum, albeit I've been following this thread for quite a while.

I have a question in mind. If we assume that this young girl was a native Texan & U.S. citizen, what kind of official documents must she have had back in 1980? And what official records must the state authorities have had about her those days? I'm thinking about for example a birth certificate, ID card, social security number etc... Sorry if this is a stupid question, I'm from Central Europe and not really familiar with how things go in the United States (also sorry for my English).

A birth record should be on file for all persons born in the US. Texas is one of the states with birth records that can be accessed in Ancestry .com. So if she was born in Texas, there is probably a birth record for her in Ancestry.

As for an ID card, many kids don't need an official government ID card until they start driving (usually at age 16), or a passport if they need to travel outside of the country.

A Social Security number is usually assigned in the first few years of life, but a SocSec number is needed if the parents want to claim the tax exemption allowed for each dependent. And a SocSec number is required to enroll in school and/or start a job.

But none of those sources are of any use to us without a name to search for.
 
  • #2,218
There are probably school records somewhere, too, but again those wouldn't be much help without a name.

Sent from my SM-T560NU using Tapatalk
 
  • #2,219
Thank you for your answers, all of you. That's what I was curious about.
 
  • #2,220
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
105
Guests online
2,885
Total visitors
2,990

Forum statistics

Threads
632,576
Messages
18,628,647
Members
243,198
Latest member
ghghhh13
Back
Top