Found Deceased TX - Michael Chambers, 70, Hunt County, 10 March 2017 #6

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #461
Exactly- I believe MC knew of an affair... not sure he knew about all. I also believe he believed the affair was over. I don’t think he would have allowed an open marriage or anything of that sort- I was throwing it out there as maybe BC told her boyfriend this and that maybe the convo between MC and boyfriend was clearing up what was really going on opposed to what BC said was going on. I believe MC was a very strong, loving, forgiving man and do think he knew some of BC’s discretions but not all. I do think he loved her dearly but I can imagine there was an ultimatum to her: “give up the side man, or I’m out!” I truly believe BC loved the way MC spoiled her, put her above anyone... this is what she didn’t want to lose. She loved the thrill and excitement of a boyfriend(s) but did not want to give up the husband that completely adored her. I don’t think she was in love with MC anymore. In love with how he treated her maybe ...
Agreed!

Sent from my SM-J727P using Tapatalk
 
  • #462
And I think there is only one male JP in Hunt County at the moment

Sent from my SM-J727P using Tapatalk
Wonder if his wife will see the interview?
 
  • #463
I have a feeling that there are going to be a few divorce proceedings after this is all said and done
Wonder if his wife will see the interview?

Sent from my SM-J727P using Tapatalk
 
  • #464
Or already have been. Would be very telling.
I have a feeling that there are going to be a few divorce proceedings after this is all said and done

Sent from my SM-J727P using Tapatalk

Sent from my SCH-I435L using Tapatalk
 
  • #465
Or already have been. Would be very telling.

Sent from my SCH-I435L using Tapatalk
Good point! Something to look into

Sent from my SM-J727P using Tapatalk
 
  • #466
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QmwicGo_C5I

At 13:45 Klein states BC talked to the boyfriend on her cell phone.
At 14:40 he starts discussing the timeline........Klein says it is up for discussion.

He states she got off work around 2-2:30. This is when she calls the boyfriend and her phone immediately goes dark for 1 hour and 32 minutes. Within 15 minutes of being turned back on she is calling family, neighbors and everyone yo ask "have you seen MC" She eventually calls 911. He doesn't go into any other timeline here.

I am taking this to mean she arrived home around 4ish or so......calls and looks for MC and then calls 911 and LE gets involved.

Something else I picked up on in this second listen is Klein states the JP who issued the declaration of death is a "Friend with Benefits"! I had not picked up on that the first time I listened.
I wonder if Klein just isn't good at stating the details, he mentions he has leaves his lesson of stating a timeline.
He says she finished work at 2-2:30, called her boyfriend and her phone went dark right after talking to him. But he also says they talked 3 times in the afternoon before her phone went dark. Maybe he meant they talked at 2 and 2:30 and also they talked right before her phone went dark. Or maybe his version of "right before" has some leeway. Like I noticed he said it was dark for 1 hr 32 min and another time he said almost 2 hrs. I felt he was rounding up, a slight exaggeration maybe. So maybe if they spoke at 2:30 and her phone went dark a little after 3 he could call that "right before". We may be taking it to literal.
Also there were 2 911 calls. Do we know when she first called? Is there any article saying when she talked to the neighbor or how long she was home before she started to look for him?
 
  • #467
I wonder if Klein just isn't good at stating the details, he mentions he has leaves his lesson of stating a timeline.
He says she finished work at 2-2:30, called her boyfriend and her phone went dark right after talking to him. But he also says they talked 3 times in the afternoon before her phone went dark. Maybe he meant they talked at 2 and 2:30 and also they talked right before her phone went dark. Or maybe his version of "right before" has some leeway. Like I noticed he said it was dark for 1 hr 32 min and another time he said almost 2 hrs. I felt he was rounding up, a slight exaggeration maybe. So maybe if they spoke at 2:30 and her phone went dark a little after 3 he could call that "right before". We may be taking it to literal.
Also there were 2 911 calls. Do we know when she first called? Is there any article saying when she talked to the neighbor or how long she was home before she started to look for him?
No matter how you look at it, that version of time doesn't make sense. Especially since it was said in the petition that BC texted MC at 551pm...and the 911 call was made at 6:55pm based on the press conference and most articles. Not sure if it was the first or second though...still confused lol

Sent from my SM-J727P using Tapatalk
 
  • #468
No matter how you look at it, that version of time doesn't make sense. Especially since it was said in the petition that BC texted MC at 551pm...and the 911 call was made at 6:55pm based on the press conference and most articles. Not sure if it was the first or second though...still confused lol

Sent from my SM-J727P using Tapatalk
Oh I forgot about the text to MC!
 
  • #469
No matter how you look at it, that version of time doesn't make sense. Especially since it was said in the petition that BC texted MC at 551pm...and the 911 call was made at 6:55pm based on the press conference and most articles. Not sure if it was the first or second though...still confused lol

Sent from my SM-J727P using Tapatalk
I just had a thought about the calls. I wonder if they can tell how long the phone call took. Like he said she called him at 2. And also mentioned 2:30 and said they talked 3 times. I wonder for how long and if he can tell that by tower data or if there are other phone records.
Another thing he said around the 36 mark when stating concern about the bf lying, he talked to her 3 times before she went dark and once after and at 5:30 in the morning. Did he misstate this meaning once after is the time at 5:30 am? Or does it indicate he has the bf's phone records and sees that he called her phone after it was off?
 
  • #470
It's just another wrench thrown in there, if its true. I'm not so sure now
Oh I forgot about the text to MC!

Sent from my SM-J727P using Tapatalk
 
  • #471
I just had a thought about the calls. I wonder if they can tell how long the phone call took. Like he said she called him at 2. And also mentioned 2:30 and said they talked 3 times. I wonder for how long and if he can tell that by tower data or if there are other phone records.
Another thing he said around the 36 mark when stating concern about the bf lying, he talked to her 3 times before she went dark and once after and at 5:30 in the morning. Did he misstate this meaning once after is the time at 5:30 am? Or does it indicate he has the bf's phone records and sees that he called her phone after it was off?

He says the phone goes dark sometime in the afternoon for approximately 1 and a half hours. Then all of a sudden it comes back on and within 15 minutes of it coming on, she is calling neighbors, family, and friends. When he was later asked by the interviewer if he could verify her work schedule he did back track and say yes she was done around 2-230 and her phone was off... she was off the radar. What time was the first person called by BC???

Sent from my SM-J727P using Tapatalk
 
  • #472
Thinking of JC2 today and hoping his condition is improving.

Sent from my SCH-I435L using Tapatalk
 
  • #473
I just had a thought about the calls. I wonder if they can tell how long the phone call took. Like he said she called him at 2. And also mentioned 2:30 and said they talked 3 times. I wonder for how long and if he can tell that by tower data or if there are other phone records.
Another thing he said around the 36 mark when stating concern about the bf lying, he talked to her 3 times before she went dark and once after and at 5:30 in the morning. Did he misstate this meaning once after is the time at 5:30 am? Or does it indicate he has the bf's phone records and sees that he called her phone after it was off?

He says he has her phone records so I am sure he knows exactly how long she talked and to whom....

He also said he didn't want to get too literal with the timeline because it gets crazy.(my word, not his). I don't think he wants to tell all he knows about specific timelines.

What he was saying was she talked to the boyfriend 3 times that day when the boyfriend originally told him (or his investigator) he hadn't spoken to her in over a year......
 
  • #474
Exactly- I believe MC knew of an affair... not sure he knew about all. I also believe he believed the affair was over. I don’t think he would have allowed an open marriage or anything of that sort- I was throwing it out there as maybe BC told her boyfriend this and that maybe the convo between MC and boyfriend was clearing up what was really going on opposed to what BC said was going on. I believe MC was a very strong, loving, forgiving man and do think he knew some of BC’s discretions but not all. I do think he loved her dearly but I can imagine there was an ultimatum to her: “give up the side man, or I’m out!” I truly believe BC loved the way MC spoiled her, put her above anyone... this is what she didn’t want to lose. She loved the thrill and excitement of a boyfriend(s) but did not want to give up the husband that completely adored her. I don’t think she was in love with MC anymore. In love with how he treated her maybe ...

I agree with your statement about MC’s feelings for BC. I beg to differ on the part about her being “in love” with the way he treated her. IMO she took advantage of his feelings, lost respect for him, and didn’t want him in her life anymore.

To me it sounds like MC just put up with BC’s affairs because he’d rather have her in his life than give her up to someone else. I do think he cared about the affairs. I just don’t think he was bothered enough to take his own life because of it.
 
  • #475
Thinking of JC2 today and hoping his condition is improving.

Sent from my SCH-I435L using Tapatalk

I talked with his wife and she said he’s improving greatly and the doctors are all impressed with his progress. He should be able to go home within a couple weeks if all goes well and he should be able to walk again. Hope it’s okay to post this.
 
  • #476
He says he has her phone records so I am sure he knows exactly how long she talked and to whom....

He also said he didn't want to get too literal with the timeline because it gets crazy.(my word, not his). I don't think he wants to tell all he knows about specific timelines.

What he was saying was she talked to the boyfriend 3 times that day when the boyfriend originally told him (or his investigator) he hadn't spoken to her in over a year......
He did say he didn't want to use specific times at first but later on the interviewer kind of snuck in the back door and asked him in a different way. In my opinion Klein wasn't planning on releasing the 2 o'clock time but it slipped out

Sent from my SM-J727P using Tapatalk
 
  • #477
Thrilled to hear this!!
I talked with his wife and she said he’s improving greatly and the doctors are all impressed with his progress. He should be able to go home within a couple weeks if all goes well and he should be able to walk again. Hope it’s okay to post this.

Sent from my SCH-I435L using Tapatalk
 
  • #478
Does anyone know if BC had asked MC to go to Walmart that day and time? Wasn't she talking to her bf on the phone that same day? Maybe she set MC's up with the Walmart trip so someone could've been waiting in his shop when he returned home? A surprise attack with the wooden dowel and then kidnapping/removing him from the property? Which people would profit from him being gone? Follow the money.
 
  • #479
And I think there is only one male JP in Hunt County at the moment

Sent from my SM-J727P using Tapatalk

I found 3. And only one female.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
  • #480
I found 3. And only one female.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
You are correct but I meant in Greenville specifically...sorry I should have clarified:)


Sent from my SM-J727P using Tapatalk
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
113
Guests online
1,926
Total visitors
2,039

Forum statistics

Threads
632,516
Messages
18,627,838
Members
243,174
Latest member
daydoo93
Back
Top