jash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2011
- Messages
- 3,491
- Reaction score
- 21,484
Defense questioning about transfer DNA and cross contamination. The defense asks why it's important to not cross contaminate evidence? Ferrara struggles to answer that question. Doesn't say anything. After 10 seconds of thinking, defense has "no further questions."
Ferrara says if she could go back to that crime scene again, she would not do anything differently.
Oof -- I felt uncomfortable just reading this. I understand being cross-examined is no picnic (I've been there) and defense tries to trip up and discredit witnesses but yikes. You should be able to say why it's important not to cross contaminate evidence.