Bigger question, if bullying was the motive, why deal with it by killing people![]()
I understand what your saying though.
You'd think logically he'd want to take out those he felt that wronged him? I guess we'll never know unless he starts talking.
Bigger question, if bullying was the motive, why deal with it by killing people![]()
I understand what your saying though.
Are shotguns used for this ?
You'd think logically he'd want to take out those he felt that wronged him? I guess we'll never know unless he starts talking.
Another day, another school shooting. I have no words that will add anything productive to the discussion.
Instead I will share a couple of articles.
This is a good article from a few years back in the New Yorker about how school shootings spread .. goes into quite a bit of depth. I recommend it for anyone trying to get their head around why these incidents keep happening.
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/10/19/thresholds-of-violence
This is another in-depth article which gets into the issue of people in the community paying attention to warning signs.
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2015/10/mass-shootings-threat-assessment-shooter-fbi-columbine/
Because I mentioned him before:
John Barnes was the police officer critically injuried on the scene. He was shot with the shotgun and wounded in both arms (I would imagine chest too, IMO).
For 23 years, John Barnes worked for the Houston Police Department, patrolling the streets of citys southwest side, and later hunting rapists and pedophiles.
But his most dangerous day came four months into his new job as a school police officer in Santa Fe, when gunman opened fire in the towns high school, killing ten and critically injuring Barnes.
https://m.chron.com/news/houston-te...26475.php?ipid=mobbreaking#item-85307-tbla-55
I wonder if he was wearing a vest?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Confirmed at press conference by sheriff.
2 firearms--
A shotgun (not mentioned by sheriff if it was sawed off, which is illegal, and the comment was it WAS owned legally by the father of the shooter)
And a .38 revolver (holds 5, 6, or 8 rounds depending on the model-- 5 or 6 is most common). Revolvers are NOT quick to re-load, even using a rapid re-loader device, which takes a lot of practice. This is a "low capacity" weapon, with no external magazine.
There was NO semi-automatic weapon used at this mass shooting.
The New Yorker article is very good. Sad. But to me, it really just leaves me with more questions. And I guess thats the point in a way; there just aren't any answers.
Between Columbine and Aaron Ybarra, the riot changed: it became more and more self-referential, more ritualized, more and more about identification with the school-shooting tradition. Eric Harris wanted to start a revolution. Aguilar and Ybarra wanted to join one. Harris saw himself as a hero. Aguilar and Ybarra were hero-worshippers.
I wonder if he was wearing a vest?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The more you bash the NRA, the stronger they get. :thumb:
I have to wonder why the ATF is responding so quickly to this school shooting? IIRC, the ATF hasn't responded to other school shootings this rapidly, if at all. Is it solely because of the improvised explosives?
I'm glad they're there, but it seems strange-- out of school shooting patterns-- for them to show up so quickly.
This is from 8:28 this morning-- less than an hour after the shootings. Anyone else find that odd?
https://twitter.com/ATFHQ/status/99...hooting-today-2018-05-18-live-stream-updates/
So it is illegal to sell a handgun to someone under 18. Yet he posts a picture of a handgun on social media. Without getting into specifics of TX law, to me that is a warning sign which should have been reported to LE for them to follow up on. We will see if that happened.
Oh lord all mighty, to think that the biggest thing we had to worry about in the 70's was getting busted for pot...
We never, ever, ever had to deal with something like this. It wasn't even on the radar. It wasn't even a thought. Or a possibility. Or even something anyone could fathom. I can't even imagine being a student, teacher, or parent right now.
My heart wonders when will it end? How many kids? Why?
Someone please answer to us. Don't give me good guy bad guy scenario like some Clint Eastwood movie. It's a movie!
What every terrorist knows is the element of surprise. And that is something no one can ever plan for.
Will congress ever do the right thing? Not without a turnover, because while there are more guns than citizens, there is still the mindset. Imagine how powerful it would be if our government took safety measures while still protecting the second amendment?
Imagine how powerful our government would be if it substituted the wall for kids, North Korea for kids, Iran for kids, Israel for kids, China for kids, EU for kids.
Imagine a UN for kids?
I am skeptical, because I am old, been there done that... Show me something new. You say you are the great negotiater, it is your moniker, your monkey.
Well then, prove it.
Maybe we should close the loophole in federal law that exempts gun owners from legal culpability when their guns are not properly stored, stolen and used in crimes.
And yet, these shootings always happen at public schools, very rarely private schools.
I wonder why.