I really wish to write a letter to the attorneys for both of these murderers to tell them that their attempts to downplay the evil, malicous, inhuman quality of their clients, are not working. That Zeigler's lawyer tries to say his client is just a big teddy bear just makes me hate his client all the more. What is wrong with this kind of slimy lawyer? I am an attorney. I could never utter such unethical garage in my life to get an edge on a case. Besides, it does not work. It just makes the lawyer look like a nut. What he should do is shut his mouth and counsel his client to do the right thing and plead guilty for the things he has done. This case really scares me. It is eerily similar to one I have been litigating. Mom got re-married and fought (and won) to move out of state with her child. But step dad insists that the three year old call him yes sir and no sir and memorize long bible passages. He also spanks the kid. When I argued in court for an order that he not be allowed to do so (which I got), mother's attorney argued that stepdad spanking the child was part of the family "discipline plan". Sound familiar? He apparently keeps spanking the child against the court orders but we cannot prove it. I hope it doesn't end up like Riley's situation.[/quote]
You can't get a restraining order for the child in your case? I would think that if the child were asked if he/she were still being spanked by a judge in judges chambers or in front of their pediatrician during an appointment, and the pediatrician documented it, that this would be sufficient proof. Doctors records in my state are considered absolute proof...[/QUOTE]
You can't get a restraining order for the child in your case? I would think that if the child were asked if he/she were still being spanked by a judge in judges chambers or in front of their pediatrician during an appointment, and the pediatrician documented it, that this would be sufficient proof. Doctors records in my state are considered absolute proof...[/QUOTE]