TX - Terri 'Missy' Bevers,45, murdered in church/person in SWAT gear,18 Apr 2016 #10

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #581
That makes perfect sense that she would spend lots of time on there. When looking at her LinkedIn profile she had 500 people on there. I am certain it's safe to say she didn't know them all on an extremely personal level, in fact I bet most were simply acquaintances at best. So it could have been a red herring, or she could have had an idea of who it was but played it off when talking to her friend, by saying she didn't know the person, but the fear was real!

500 people on her linkedin and she got one creepy message. What's the motive to kill her? I'm missing it. Thanks tiffay01!
 
  • #582
  • #583
My question is this:
We know why the ILs and BB made it to the list, however, my curiosity leads me to ask what put KC/MC and AT/CT on that list. Could it have been information gleaned from interviews?

Something that stuck out to me from the AT&T warrant was the part that said something about tips about people who looked like the suspect and that these people were also included in the Target Numbers group. Am I reading that right? If so, I wonder who is on the list for that reason.
 
  • #584
If someone is going to flirt/cheat...its risky to send texts or fb messages. What husband would think to check his wife's Linkedin?
Not mine!

I have heard of stranger things. Or maybe my friends are just lying cheaters who find ways around getting busted.
 
  • #585
While we had a little "break", I was sitting here thinking how weird it is that Missy carried on this "familiar and flirtatious" conversation with this guy on LinkedIn AND another guy (or girl, we don't know for sure) ALSO sends Missy a message on LinkedIn. I know people use LinkedIn, but I would think that if someone wanted to send her a creepy message, they would send it on her FB. I don't know....I just can't help but feel that the two are related in some way. :thinking:

Maybe 'creepy" guy is the wife, in disguise, taunting MB through Linkedin after seeing MB and husband linked up?
 
  • #586
I'm only a mere 30 pages behind, so perhaps it's already been said, but I have to say this out loud, right now. … what if Swatperp used MB's cell phone to do the picture-taking/recording?

I see arrest(s) coming soon. The document dump was absolutely calculated by LE. They know who murdered Missy & the motive behind it.imho
 
  • #587
sunsetbeach, what did they say in the WFAA news story?

Let me see if I can find the video for ya. I looked earlier but it wasn't up yet. brb.
 
  • #588
oh my goodness so much to catch up on. so if the person who sent the creepy message on LinkedIn wasn't known to either MB or her friend do we think it was a dummy/troll account? cus if the police believe she was targeted and was texting with her killer then the message is either just a really weird unfortunate coincidence that has nothing to do with the case or it was the killer masking him/herself or someone connected to the killer.
 
  • #589
Something that stuck out to me from the AT&T warrant was the part that said something about tips about people who looked like the suspect and that these people were also included in the Target Numbers group. Am I reading that right? If so, I wonder who is on the list for that reason.

CT had some type of ankle problem (Read on an earlier post here) that could give her a specific gate and RB, we know from video, has a penguins like walk. Of the others, I don't think we know.
 
  • #590
LOL so far behind but gonna repost this. I looked up immediate Cell towers around the Creekside Church last night and posted Here...



Have to go back and see if if the further looking I did tonight .. if that post survived the cut ;)
JMHO

I don't know if you all discussed this already, but the search warrant was to AT&T, right? Not Verizon or other carriers? So does that mean they suspect the suspect was on an AT&T phone?

JMO
 
  • #591
I'm confused about what we can and cannot share. Mods, forgive me please if I tread more like an elephant than lightly and delete this, if needed. One person listed in the affidavit broke an ankle sliding in a ball game. The ankle was also displaced and had ligament damage and required surgery.

Can I share that?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • #592
IMO I still think this was planned for a looooong time. Does anyone know if BB had any family members who went to Creekside? BB talked about how very protective MT was of him. Almost said something else but stopped. Sounds like guilt on both sides per ?affairs? But as stated, I think someone close to BB had enough after Austin. I think a very strong female "Christian" did this. Hated everything about MB. Thought she wasn't being a good Mom etc. BB family wasn't too thrilled with MB it seems to me. They put on a BIG show afterwards. Guilty dog barks first in my opinion.
 
  • #593
LE mentioned the feminine type of walk,"swaying", or something like it, and that the person on the video looked to have an injured right foot,or ankle ? There is a person mentioned who had an injury to their right ankle ? Seems clear. jmo Never thought it was a woman who did this....I'm gob smacked.
 
  • #594
I need all you couch PIs (in my case, bed PI) to help me think of LE strategy on this one.

All of those names in search warrants released have children. That means a lot of lives are affected by the release of these documents today, especially in a small town. LE could have easily sealed them or blacked out the names, which they did not. I just feel like there's some reasoning behind why they chose to show everything in full. Does anyone have any thoughts on this?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • #595
Doesn't it seem a bit odd that with having financial problems that BB would spend the money on plane fare, hotel, golf and deep sea fishing?

And two cell phones per warrant. Unless I misunderstood. I'm late to this having only arrived at this thread (yikes! #10!) I guess some people do have more than one, but I don't know any. Is one of his strictly for business and the other is for personal?
 
  • #596
Originally Posted by cattlekate View Post
The warrant would be sealed, I would think. And hope.

Not necessarily. As others have pointed out, this has happened in other cases.

Also, BB is named in the warrant and he still has his kids, as far as we know. And plenty of people have suspected him all along; probably many still do.

The people in the warrant knew they were being investigated. Why is it more unsafe for them to have their children now than a week or two ago when the warrants were served?
Exactly. So far (and I am some behind looking at all the ones released today so I could be wrong) But , all the warrants releases so far, have been few days behind when they were actually written/acted upon them . So honestly, they are "old" news to LEO and those included in them, but NEW news to the Public. JMHO
 
  • #597
The warrant states the they found evidence of financial troubles. The wording is confusing. But I gather she was chatting about her money troubles in her texts with "phone number of interest"

Yeah, what are "financial troubles?" For instance, "Honey, did you make the deposit? We need dog food." ----does that indicate "financial troubles?"
 
  • #598
I need all you couch PIs (in my case, bed PI) to help me think of LE strategy on this one.

All of those names in search warrants released have children. That means a lot of lives are affected by the release of these documents today, especially in a small town. LE could have easily sealed them or blacked out the names, which they did not. I just feel like there's some reasoning behind why they chose to show everything in full. Does anyone have any thoughts on this?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Perhaps hoping to scare someone into talking and/or turning on their spouse.
 
  • #599
There have been so many posts it's difficult to keep up...but are you the local that posted earlier that there had been gossip/talk in town about AJ & CT possibly being involved in the crime?

Yes & I stated why we thought it was them from the start. If you are asking bc I posted that CT came from a great family, my thoughts don't change on that. She can still be highly intelligent and come from a great family, but commit a crime. Lord knows we've seen astronauts and doctors and politicians driven to do crazy things when it comes to love.
 
  • #600
Maybe 'creepy" guy is the wife, in disguise, taunting MB through Linkedin after seeing MB and husband linked up?
"

Or maybe he really was a creepy guy and after seeing Missy's profile pic, he complimented her "assets". This happens on the internet.

To me that's the definition of creepy guy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
105
Guests online
2,640
Total visitors
2,745

Forum statistics

Threads
632,680
Messages
18,630,378
Members
243,248
Latest member
nonameneeded777
Back
Top