- Joined
- Oct 24, 2020
- Messages
- 103
- Reaction score
- 636
Thanks for the update. I keep hoping his family gets some of the answers they deserve. The truth needs to come out and whoever's responsible be held accountable.
The autopsy does not say "pre-mortem" at any point - the word used is "perimortem" - which references a time period of days preceding death to weeks following death.The autopsy has been released on Kleins FB page!
Short version: 2 catastrophic injuries pre-mortem to his head
![]()
Klein Investigations and Consulting | Nederland TX
Klein Investigations and Consulting, Nederland. 28,520 likes · 46 talking about this · 6 were here. Looking for Investigation needs? Contact us today! We do process serving, background checks, computwww.facebook.com
THIS!! Klein is completely misrepresenting the findings to suit his latest narrative. IMO he has been the worst thing that could have happened to this case.The autopsy does not say "pre-mortem" at any point - the word used is "perimortem" - which references a time period of days preceding death to weeks following death.
I mean - yea. But what is more likely here?THIS!! Klein is completely misrepresenting the findings to suit his latest narrative. IMO he has been the worst thing that could have happened to this case.
Snipped from autopsy report...
Probably the same person that planted Thomas’s phone.It’s incredibly frustrating that this still hasn’t been solved. The only way it will ever be solved absent some confession is the answer to a few answers to a few keystone questions. So maybe it would be good if we compile a list of questions and try to narrow them down to the most keystone of keystones.
The first thing that pops into my mind - assuming TB was already dead or incapacitated - who was driving the dodge durango around town as seen on cctv that early morning and who could have parked the car near the water treatment plant?
Why would a friend keep the phone and then decide to plant it to be found? What would be their motive in the phone being found? If a friend had the phone and there was a connection to what happened to Tom that night, the phone would have been at the bottom of the Canadian River never to be found.Probably the same person that planted Thomas’s phone.
I think one of Thomas’s friends held on to that phone and planted it at the search. Not the police, not his mother.
Someone knows everything.
Someone that couldn't leave the Durango where Tom's body was left b/c there was no way to get back into town. And they couldn't risk driving back through town at that time of the morning. They needed a place to leave it that would be on the edge of town and still easy to walk into town and/or get picked up by someone.It’s incredibly frustrating that this still hasn’t been solved. The only way it will ever be solved absent some confession is the answer to a few answers to a few keystone questions. So maybe it would be good if we compile a list of questions and try to narrow them down to the most keystone of keystones.
The first thing that pops into my mind - assuming TB was already dead or incapacitated - who was driving the dodge durango around town as seen on cctv that early morning and who could have parked the car near the water treatment plant?
If this truly was a friend, they likely know what happened or know a HECK of a lot more than they have said. Planting the phone could be a way of admitting they know something, giving a chance of getting the story out, and not having to say it or risk exposure.Why would a friend keep the phone and then decide to plant it to be found? What would be their motive in the phone being found? If a friend had the phone and there was a connection to what happened to Tom that night, the phone would have been at the bottom of the Canadian River never to be found.