Thanks, it would be good to clarify this point.I emailed someone at NamUs, if they do allow mtDNA I will inquire about how the auto matchup works with cases with mtDNA, Considering mtDNA isn't 100 percent unique
Thanks, it would be good to clarify this point.I emailed someone at NamUs, if they do allow mtDNA I will inquire about how the auto matchup works with cases with mtDNA, Considering mtDNA isn't 100 percent unique
@SimsGuy67 did you ever submit this one? looks like an interesting possibility, even with the circumstances noted on Charley Project around Sheryl's possible demise.Hey everyone. I have been heavily considering Sheyl Denise Taylor as a potential match for this Jane Doe. The Grimes County Jane Doe has also been heavily considered and police have got DNA for Sheryl to see if they match. I don't think that Doe is her but I do think the Vidor Jane Doe really could be.
![]()
![]()
Now, the main factor here is that this Jane Doe had shorter hair than Sheryl. There are two possibilities here.
1. She cut he hair if she ran away after her disappearance.
2. Her hair was short when she disappeared.
I think that possibility 2 is the most likely explanation and the one piece of evidence for this is an unconfirmed yearbook photo of Sheryl from 1978 in Picher, the year after this one.
![]()
This photo depicts Sheryl having short hair, like this Jane Doe. This puts the Vidor Jane Doe more likely to be Sheryl than the Grimes County Jane Doe IMO. Height also seems like an issue but I suspect that:
1. Sheryl's height is off.
2. The Doe's height is off.
On Vidor Jane Doe's profile, they say that they know the height is an estimate and may be a few inches off. Also, Sheryl's height seems very off for even a 12 year old. My guess would be that she is closer to 4'5 than 4'.
I feel that timing and location are the only problems here. I know hair color but I have seen hair color change slightly post-mortem in some cases. Here is Sheryl's thread:
Vidor Jane Doe UP4574 Sheryl Denise Taylor- Charley Proj. Sex Female Female Race White/Caucasian White/Caucsaian Age 12 - 20 12 DLC/DOD 1983 - 1984 July 20, 1978 Height 4'10 - 5'2 4' Weight Unknown 60 pounds Hair Color Brown Red/Auburn Eye Color Unknown Hazel Distinctive Features Unknown Supposed to wear a patch over one eye but often takes it off. Circumstances Found in field. Last seen in Picher, OK. Notably didn't like it there. Distance Picher - Vidor 553 miles (9hrs 17mins)
![]()
OK - OK - Sheryl/Cheryl Denise Taylor, 12, Picher, July 1978
Not in Namus, nor can I find a thread. CRIME What happened to a Picher teen missing for 45 years? by: Sheila Stogsdill Posted: Jan 12, 2023 / 03:46 PM CST Updated: Jan 12, 2023 / 04:22 PM CST Sheryl Taylor hasn't been seen since July 20, 1978 PICHER, Okla. — A retired law enforcement...www.websleuths.com
I looked and I did submit this all the way back in March 2023. I got nothing more than the usual confirmation response from NamUs.@SimsGuy67 did you ever submit this one? looks like an interesting possibility, even with the circumstances noted on Charley Project around Sheryl's possible demise.
Hello All!
There was a recent post about Vidor Jane Doe on another website which eventually lead me to this thread. I had responded to the other post just as @Caring1 had here with data/picture of Vidor JD’s exclusions list. Once I did, I realized that one of the girls listed (Julie Moseley) is one of the three missing Texas girls of the famous Fort Worth Trio.
It made me wonder why they wouldn’t have tested the other two FT Trio girls against Vidor JD? Seeing they all could fit the UIP basic data… Why only Julie Moseley? Perhaps they just figured if it wasn’t one of them, it wouldn’t be any of them? Ugh, that just feels mighty fallible to me.
I went ahead and double checked the other two trio girls’ profiles to make sure— based on the basics, they both could also potentially be Vidor Jane Doe. Weird. I mean, no matter the unlikelihood, it just feels nonsensical not to test them against this JD too… I’m doing some further research now, but what about the other two girls for Vidor Jane? I’ve listed links to their NAMUS profiles below.
Mary “Rachel” Trlica
Lisa Wilson
Here’s where I’d love some of your eyes and thoughts… the descriptions of clothing Lisa Wilson was wearing when she went missing + clothing found with Vidor Jane read potentially… similar? I’m doing further research on both, but wanted to put this out there too.Hello All!
There was a recent post about Vidor Jane Doe on another website which eventually lead me to this thread. I had responded to the other post just as @Caring1 had here with data/picture of Vidor JD’s exclusions list. Once I did, I realized that one of the girls listed (Julie Moseley) is one of the three missing Texas girls of the famous Fort Worth Trio.
It made me wonder why they wouldn’t have tested the other two FT Trio girls against Vidor JD? Seeing they all could fit the UIP basic data… Why only Julie Moseley? Perhaps they just figured if it wasn’t one of them, it wouldn’t be any of them? Ugh, that just feels mighty fallible to me.
I went ahead and double checked the other two trio girls’ profiles to make sure— based on the basics, they both could also potentially be Vidor Jane Doe. Weird. I mean, no matter the unlikelihood, it just feels nonsensical not to test them against this JD too… I’m doing some further research now, but what about the other two girls for Vidor Jane? I’ve listed links to their NAMUS profiles below.
Mary “Rachel” Trlica
Lisa Wilson
Sorry about that! That was my bad. I don’t know how to interact with WebSleuths very well yet:/ as soon as I tagged your name, it automatically posted my unfinished comment. So I went ahead and edited it to finish what I was typing from there! Would love to know your thoughts! I posted another comment as a reply to this first one that you’re tagged in.That’s strange, I only see the first two sentences from your post until I hit “reply”. Once I click reply, I can see the rest of it which now makes sense.
Oh ok, I understand what happened. No biggie, thought I had a glitch.Sorry about that! That was my bad. I don’t know how to interact with WebSleuths very well yet:/ as soon as I tagged your name, it automatically posted my unfinished comment. So I went ahead and edited it to finish what I was typing from there! Would love to know your thoughts! I posted another comment as a reply to this first one that you’re tagged in.
*[on my way to take a how to Websleuth lesson now]* lol.