UK - 22 dead in explosion at Ariana Grande gig, Manchester, 22 May 2017 #1

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #841
From the site: "The Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) continues to advise against all travel to Libya, and for British
nationals still in Libya to leave immediately by commercial means.


"The GOV.UK ADVISES AGAINST ALL TRAVEL covers all of LIBYA

https://www.gov.uk/foreign-travel-advice/libya
 
  • #842
  • #843
< modsnip>I just want them to stop doing it. Its undermining the investigation and causing more pain for the victims.

I am afraid you will be disappointed. They will continue to leak like a sieve just like they have done for almost a year now and our MSM will continue to divulge information they know they shouldn't ethically release.

Besides showing the evidence of the bomb and releasing the bomber's name prematurely it was totally disrespectful, and unfeeling to all of the victims who have died and to others fighting for their lives.

All of this leaking has to be highly upsetting to the families who are already overwhelmed by unimaginable grief. I can understand why those in the UK are extremely upset. Many of us feel here feel the exact same way. It seems to only get worse and the leakers are never found accountable for any of their criminal acts.

Releasing the name of the suspect before the UK did could have had dire consequences for those investigating this horrific mass murder. It could have impeded their investigation which was in full force at the time his name was leaked. I knew there was a very good reason for LE there to hold off naming the bomber. And even though they continue to roundup suspects in Manchester we don't know for certain if some of them were able to flee once they knew he had been named publicly by our press.

Again, Shadow, I am so sorry this has happened.
 
  • #844
I am afraid you will be disappointed. They will continue to leak like a sieve just like they have done for almost a year now and our MSM will continue to divulge information they know they shouldn't ethically release.

Besides showing the evidence of the bomb and releasing the bomber's name prematurely it was totally disrespectful, and unfeeling to all of the victims who have died and to others fighting for their lives.

All of this leaking has to be highly upsetting to the families who are already overwhelmed by unimaginable grief. I can understand why those in the UK are extremely upset. Many of us feel here feel the exact same way. It seems to only get worse and the leakers are never found accountable for any of their criminal acts.

Releasing the name of the suspect before the UK did could have had dire consequences for those investigating this horrific mass murder. It could have impeded their investigation which was in full force at the time his name was leaked. I knew there was a very good reason for LE there to hold off naming the bomber. And even though they continue to roundup suspects in Manchester we don't know for certain if some of them were able to flee once they knew he had been named publicly by our press.

Again, Shadow, I am so sorry this has happened.

Very well put. I worked in aerospace and defense for many years, and this is very, very frustrating.
 
  • #845
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz4hwfZuhAR
"A brave aunt who 'shielded' her young niece from the deadly Manchester terror blast has died, MailOnline can reveal.
Just wondering how you can shield someone in a random bomb blast. To my mind it's not possible. I haven't read through all this thread and don't mean to cause offence, but wondering if others are finding the coverage of this attack and the attack itself difficult to believe? Moo
 
  • #846
  • #847
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz4hwfZuhAR
"A brave aunt who 'shielded' her young niece from the deadly Manchester terror blast has died, MailOnline can reveal.
Just wondering how you can shield someone in a random bomb blast. To my mind it's not possible. I haven't read through all this thread and don't mean to cause offence, but wondering if others are finding the coverage of this attack and the attack itself difficult to believe? Moo

I can only guess but the Aunt may have seen the bomber a second before he detonated the bomb, and instinctively covered her niece with her own body trying to shield her from the bomb blast.

I am not sure what you mean? I don't find this heinous act hard to believe.:(

What coverage are you speaking of? The UK press or the US press?
 
  • #848
  • #849
Facial recognition technology perhaps?

Sent from my F3311 using Tapatalk
He was known to LE. A BBC article stated two of the killer's friends had previously turned him into LE for his "radical beliefs".
 
  • #850
With all due respect, Ocean, we don't know what the media's holding back on this case, either, and probably won't until we have the benefit of hindsight. Much like we have now with the DC Sniper case. Moo :peace:

I understand, but I blame both. The media knows perfectly well when it is appropriate to suppress information they receive and what should be printed. They have done it in the past, but those ethical days of journalism for the MSM are long gone.

In the DC Sniper case the media knew much more about the two suspects the police were looking for but did the right thing and did not divulge any of that information while the snipers were on the run, and not yet caught.

IMO
 
  • #851
In general, I find Daily Mail coverage of most things difficult to believe. The closest U.S. equivalent to Daily Mail is probably New York Daily News, imo.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz4hwfZuhAR
"A brave aunt who 'shielded' her young niece from the deadly Manchester terror blast has died, MailOnline can reveal.
Just wondering how you can shield someone in a random bomb blast. To my mind it's not possible. I haven't read through all this thread and don't mean to cause offence, but wondering if others are finding the coverage of this attack and the attack itself difficult to believe? Moo
 
  • #852
I want to sincerely apologize to our British members for linking the NY Times article earlier, I was trying to keep up with the msm as I always do as it was coming in, and at the time I had not fully understood the full extent of the situation re the leaks; I thought the graphic nature was the main concern which is why I posted no images and put the disclaimer, so very sorry! I was focused on the scientific content and had not read or absorbed every post up to that point!
 
  • #853
http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/manchester-arrests-1.4128891
attachment.php

Manchester health officials have raised the number of wounded in the concert bombing, saying 119 people sought medical treatment at the city's hospitals following the attack.

Jon Rouse of the Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership said 64 people were still hospitalized. He said the number of overall wounded was raised Wednesday due to the "walking wounded" who came in hours after the bombing.

Rouse said many of those hospitalized had serious wounds that would require "very long-term care and support in terms of their recovery."
 

Attachments

  • britain-concert-blast.jpg
    britain-concert-blast.jpg
    97.7 KB · Views: 180
  • #854
Just woke up to the news that Chloe Rutherford 17, her boyfriend Liam Curry 19, and Eilidh Macleod 14 have died. It is so desperately sad and awful. May they all Rest In Peace.

Margarita25 please do not blame yourself for linking the article with the photos. It's U.S intelligence that's to blame. We know how much you care about the victims. I hope the U.K government gives them hell for this.

Members from the U.K have you noticed the increased security where you are? There are a lot more police around in Glasgow. They were patrolling the shopping centre when I went out for dinner last night.
 
  • #855
RSBM
Members from the U.K have you noticed the increased security where you are? There are a lot more police around in Glasgow. They were patrolling the shopping centre when I went out for dinner last night.

I work in an industry with really high security and it was utterly surreal coming in this morning to see our normal guards replaced by military. We had been told about it, but it still felt weird!
 
  • #856
There is a national minute of silence at 11am this morning U.K time in just under three hours time. 6 am New York Time. If you would like to observe it in memory of the victims of this terrible tragedy.
 
  • #857
It has just been announced on Good Morning Britain that there are reports Greater Manchester Police have stopped sharing information about the attack with the United States.
 
  • #858
It has just been announced on Good Morning Britain that there are reports Greater Manchester Police have stopped sharing information about the attack with the United States.

BBC confirms it due to leaks on case


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
  • #859
What about the woman arrested today? I hadn't seen if she was related to the bomber.
We don't know the identity ATM. I believe the mother and sister were reported to be in Libya but then so was the bomber.
 
  • #860
I want to sincerely apologize to our British members for linking the NY Times article earlier, I was trying to keep up with the msm as I always do as it was coming in, and at the time I had not fully understood the full extent of the situation re the leaks; I thought the graphic nature was the main concern which is why I posted no images and put the disclaimer, so very sorry! I was focused on the scientific content and had not read or absorbed every post up to that point!
Margarita, if the American public are reading it then I think we should be able to as well. Personally I want to thank you and I found it very informative. It is difficult for a subject like this to keep politics out of it as it is so complex.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
116
Guests online
1,479
Total visitors
1,595

Forum statistics

Threads
632,486
Messages
18,627,487
Members
243,167
Latest member
s.a
Back
Top