stephaniejanes
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2017
- Messages
- 155
- Reaction score
- 1,168
.
isn't it Chapter 15 (Solemn Proceedings) and not 19 (Summary Proceedings)?
I actually think we're saying the same thing, in a different way. No worries, no need for apology.Ah sorry. As I said I do not have great knowledge of law. I only have personal knowledge due to speaking to prison officers and guards for approx a year
Thank youThat's really interesting.
The way that an alcoholic only functions to a degree, the way that you are deemed unfit to drive a vehicle- I can’t believe you believe people who smoke weed function normally, even they don’t hence why they smoke it.
Our weak justice system will give him 20 years minimum sentence most likely, at which point he will be eligible for parole.
I think at least 25 years.Do you think it will be that low Kyndigs ? - genuine question. I got the impression that Lord Mathews was not overly impressed with AC, so I think a stronger sentence is forthcoming. Although the post verdict reports that are submitted to him may of course alter that.
Nor have any reason to, unless he was furnishing the rigs.Perhaps. But his mother has already said in the media that she attempted to sell the house after everything that happened, so she may have been successful. And it was furniture being moved out, that doesn't sound like just his 'belongings'. They would have been shared collective items which I doubt he could demand back as 'his'.
That's exactly how I understood it. The quote in its context made perfect sense.Regarding the bit bolded by you. I think the point MRazda was making has went over your head. She wasn’t suggesting that Genie deserved less sympathy. She was applying the same logic that you applied to Rab to highlight the issues with your logic. Let’s keep in mind both parents have lost a child at no fault of their own.
Im curious and I know others follow many cases and may know the answer - can serious offenders manage to be rehabilitated, released and live a normal life many years down the line?I understand Lord Matthews gave Angus Sinclair 37 years but I think that may have been in part due to his past crimes and the fact he had already served time in prison. I do not believe he will be lenient on Aaron, but I'm not sure he will be as strong given his young age and the fact that he does not have a prior criminal record, despite how horrendous this crime was. I could be wrong though.
This is the first case that I've followed so closely.Im curious and I know others follow many cases and may know the answer - can serious offenders manage to be rehabilitated, released and live a normal life many years down the line?
Hi. New here and following all the points closely.
Can anyone explain if it was only semen DNA that was found on Alesha? Can you even distinguish between different bodily fluid types?
I’m not saying AC didn’t rape and murder but just wondered How conclusive the DNA evidence was.
<modsnipped - against TOS>
Thanks so much! I'm doing a happy dance! We really just got twitter crumbs to work with. I think the details of the testimony are all important. I'd be more than willing to chip into a fund if necessary. Thanks for taking the troubleI just e-mailed scotcourts asking about the transcript. It says they can take up to 20 days to reply though. Hopefully, I'll hear word back soon.
Paige Doherty's killer, John Leatham was handed 27 years at initial sentencing, no previous. It was tgen reduced by 4 years because he showed remorse, amongst other reasons. AC has not shown any remorse. He plead not guilty.I understand Lord Matthews gave Angus Sinclair 37 years but I think that may have been in part due to his past crimes and the fact he had already served time in prison. I do not believe he will be lenient on Aaron, but I'm not sure he will be as strong given his young age and the fact that he does not have a prior criminal record, despite how horrendous this crime was. I could be wrong though.
What if he showed some remorse between now and the sentencing? Would that be accepted and considered or doubted?Paige Doherty's killer, John Leatham was handed 27 years at initial sentencing, no previous. It was tgen reduced by 4 years because he showed remorse, amongst other reasons. AC has not shown any remorse. He plead not guilty.
It’s a shame, she hasn’t been more supported by the islanders. Whilst she raised him- she reported him and held her hands up to it all. She can’t be held personally responsible for his actions, if that thought was followed then Aleshas dad and grandparents are also responsible (which I don’t think at all!) by the fact that they didn’t keep her safe and left keys in the door and allowed their son to deal drugs. Sadly I was close to two different families who have had murders occur, neither family moved away and the community supported them. I hope she’s just moving to be nearer a better support network.
Think it was my post post you've referred to and I totally agree with you.
It may just be be too that it's a van collecting her estranged husband's belongings ... locals putting 2 and 2 together and coming up with mum moving out may not be correct.
Im curious and I know others follow many cases and may know the answer - can serious offenders manage to be rehabilitated, released and live a normal life many years down the line?
I think this case in general will be looked at legally, medically and academically and talked about for years to come.