I would go with named sources when in doubt, in this case sky say the council confirmed thisThank you!
"Parents' evening
Mark Bridger was at a parents' evening between 5.30pm and 6pm, the local council has confirmed to Sky News. And it was the same parents' evening that April Jones's family were at. But, the council has said, Coral and Paul Jones are believed to have left at 3.30pm, meaning it is unlikely they and April overlapped with Bridger."
So, which media outlet has it right then? Did the parents evening start before 5pm and this one has it wrong?
"Witnesses saw the former leisure centre worker drive to the parents evening, which started at 5pm, in his blue Land Rover Discovery a vehicle for which police have since issued an appeal for information."
Read More http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/2...-april-s-family-91466-31973882/#ixzz28RmF4cdw
And again, if he was at the parents evening at 6pm still, as the link above indicates, then how could he have almost hit that person at 6pm also? Surely he can't be in two places at exactly the same time. So, did he leave the school before 6pm? Is the person who saw him driving erratically at 6pm wrong in their times?
And the other links I posted must be wrong too then, because if April's parents where done at 3:30 they weren't still at the school when April was abducted.
The reporting indicated it was not just one occasion.
BIB I don't think so. AFAIK MH, the 7 year old witness was not one of his children. The 7 year old had been playing with his daughters and April previously but the only witness was MH who is not a daughter of MB
His former partner Elaine Dafydd, who lives close to April's home, has another daughter by her new partner, who was with April when Mr Bridger offered them a ride in his Land Rover last week.
Only covered with cardboard and a land rover is quite a tall vehicle.
I highly doubt that MB hit her with the Land Rover. The girl that was with April when she got into the vehicle doesn't seem to support this.
Why is it being discussed that maybe he hit her with his vehicle by accident and panicked? Is there anything at all pointing to this theory?
The pics of the vehicle show the front covered up, yet they revealed the registration plate number. Why cover up the front of the vehicle? Damaged maybe?
Why is it being discussed that maybe he hit her with his vehicle by accident and panicked? Is there anything at all pointing to this theory?
Why is it being discussed that maybe he hit her with his vehicle by accident and panicked? Is there anything at all pointing to this theory?
I do wonder why police let it out now that he was being arrested on suspicion of murder, rather than wait until they are forced to charge him; perhaps they had spoken to the parents and knew it would get out to the media?
MB's former partner:
Quote:
His former partner Elaine Dafydd, who lives close to April's home, has another daughter by her new partner, who was with April when Mr Bridger offered them a ride in his Land Rover last week.
Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...idnapping.html
If this is correct, the girl should have been able to recognize MB immediately.
Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...is-Land-Rover-two-days-before-kidnapping.html
I'm no fan of this guy but really, I see nothing wrong with his vehicle being parked on that estate when he has his own kids there that he collects/visits. Also, he's got several ex girlfriends an an ex wife in town. Without going into rumour, maybe he's seeing someone else on that estate.......
In my opinion, the efforts to locate April have been all out and 110%-not sure why or how mentioning her illness from the start would have changed anything?
The radiator section was covered, if there were clues, grass, weeds picked up while traveling it might stick there, they were preserving what might be evidence at a later time. Wind blows thru that section to cool the radiator and may collect other debris.
Lisser - the school and place where he is supposed to have driven erratically are literally a minute away from each other.