Deceased/Not Found UK - April Jones, 5, Machynlleth, Wales, 1 Oct 2012 #5 *M. Bridger guilty*

[PADDYWHACK]

no worries just trying to establish if the child and or parents would have known mb

They must have. Didn't the press say they were playing with Bridger's children, or did I get that wrong?

 

[Clutchbag]

Because the witness statement of one child can easily be refuted. The statements of several privy to the same thing are not so easy to refute.

yea but what has it to do with life and death of the victim

 

[Clutchbag]

Their first names are not given, at least not from this link. The other child, the 5 year old ED her parents are Rhys & Elaine.

the first and last name of the witness was given m***** H*****

how can anyone not know who the parents are

 

[Clio]

Their first names are not given, at least not from this link. The other child, the 5 year old ED her parents are Rhys & Elaine.

Which first names? I'm confused now. A lot of posters have a good grasp of who all the players are and it would be good to have it all in one place but I wouldn't know how to do that or where to put it.

 

[jigzy]

600ft from the front door is not close.

It means close as in proximity to ED's house (opposite garages)


Jmo.

 

[Clutchbag]

:

They must have. Didn't the press say they were playing with Bridger's children, or did I get that wrong?

there was a big group including bridgers children initially

it seems most had gone and only two were left, mh and aj, so im asking who mhs family are

goodnight all, god bless aj

 

[Clio]

the first and last name of the witness was given M**** H*****, how can anyone not know who the parents are and therefore work out if they knew MB

Clutchbag, you need to go change the name to initials or otherwise anonymise it your post. We are not allowed to name minors here on WS

 

[Cherwell]

the first and last name of the witness was given m* h*, how can anyone not know who the parents are and therefore work out if they knew MB

Well, I don't know and nor do you.


(John 11:35)

 

[Clutchbag]

Clutchbag, you need to go change the name to initials or otherwise anonymise it your post. We are not allowed to name minors here on WS

Done, though i dontget the rule if the names are out in public in msm which is where i got it from

 

[Clutchbag]

Well, I don't know and nor do you.


(John 11:35)

the whole point was trying to figure out if the child knew MB,
knowing who the parents are might help thats all, and whether they idd him, quoting from the bible?? lets keep religion out of this lol, best to keep things simple
See you all tomorrow, god bless little april and her searchers

 

[Clio]

Done, though i dontget the rule if the names are out in public in msm which is where i got it from

Most of the media reports have removed the child's name as she will be a witness in the trial. That report probably should have removed her name aswell but hasn't yet.

I believe it's a general rule on here not to name minors except if they are the victim, so it's okay to name April but not other children. That's why initials are used.

All the above AFAIK

 

[Clutchbag]

Most of the media reports have removed the child's name as she will be a witness in the trial. That report probably should have removed her name aswell but hasn't yet.

I believe it's a general rule on here not to name minors except if they are the victim, so it's okay to name April but not other children. That's why initials are used.

All the above AFAIK

OK but we are left with the question if the child who was with AJ knew MB or not

 

[PADDYWHACK]

OK but we are left with the question if the child who was with AJ knew MB or not

I think it is safe to assume that unless the child had only just moved onto the estate she would have known who Bridger was. Bridger did visit his children, did attend the parents evening and by all accounts slept with a lot of women on that estate.

 

[PADDYWHACK]

yea but what has it to do with life and death of the victim

I wasn't referring to the victim, but the accused who has yet to be found guilty.

 

[PADDYWHACK]

This is quite disturbing, I hope they are not witnesses.

The video cannot be embedded on here and this is the only way I can think of as a link

http:/.com/50639358

insert vimeo before the .com

 

[Clutchbag]

I wasn't referring to the victim, but the accused who has yet to be found guilty.

Ah thanks for that but if he is a patsy im sure it will come out, the police cant do that sort of thing anymore and if they have done shame on them

 

[raithjames]

This is quite disturbing, I hope they are not witnesses.

The video cannot be embedded on here and this is the only way I can think of as a link

http:/.com/50639358

insert vimeo before the .com

Your right it is disturbing they look about the correct age but very confused by what they are saying!!! It doesn't really just roll off their tongue naturally.

 

[sleuther317]

This is quite disturbing, I hope they are not witnesses.

The video cannot be embedded on here and this is the only way I can think of as a link

http:/.com/50639358

insert vimeo before the .com

Wow, and if they are, notice how nothing about a van was mentioned. Only that she popped her head around the corner and disappeared with her bike. Odd...

 

[jigzy]

Your right it is disturbing they look about the correct age but very confused by what they are saying!!! It doesn't really just roll off their tongue naturally.

They look traumatised. As for 'rolling off their tongue', we don't know that English is their first language. Their first language may be Welsh, as is the case with many people in the area. Just saying.

 

[Cherwell]

quoting from the bible?? lets keep religion out of this

And some fell upon stony ground ..... :wink: