Indeed it doesn't! I'll have a scroll through BM later. I can't believe I missed that bit. Why would they lie about that? Didn't they realise the call would be logged?!!
15:10 Witness accused of lying
The witness replies: "Does it make a difference whether I made it or not?"
Judge Wall intervenes and states Mr Dutton is 'not to argue with counsel'.
Mr Dutton: "I'm not arguing."
Judge Wall: "With respect you are now arguing with me."
Returning to the issue at hand Mr Dutton says: "I thought I had made it (the social services call)."
Mr Richmond puts it to him that his account about the call 'is a lie'.
Mr Dutton: "No it isn't a lie."
He concludes his evidence
Mr Dutton quizzed over police statement
Mr Richmond takes Mr Dutton to the statement he made to police.
He asks why he never included Hughes saying the exact phrase 'I've gone to town on him' and instead used the phrase 'gone too far'.
Mr Dutton insists the phrase Hughes said to him was that he had 'gone to town' on Arthur.
Mr Richmond asks Mr Dutton why his statement says that Karen Dutton made the anonymous call to social services and not himself.