Thanks for describing it - I didnt listen to it.
Excitement??? I feel creeps!
I noticed DM blurred the tattoo on her arm - hmmm...
Must be sth offensive.
Yes, I cannot believe the hairdressers husband who sneaked him a glass of water and hid it, could think that it was none of his business how they were treating him. I bet if they saw people cruelly treating a dog, they would report them.#arthurslaw
bystanders who view mistreatment of a child and fail to help should be prosecuted
They had their chance to report that and did not. I hope that in the future people who see that and turn their heads, will be held accountable.I would love to ask the hairdresser couple if they would’ve reported Arthur was ill treated. Shame they didn’t do it that Monday but I wonder had the events of Tuesday not happened if they would’ve felt uneasy abt what they saw and reported it in the near future. I doubt they would’ve been ok with what they saw but perhaps intended on doing something abt it
I would just love to ask them
Unsurprisingly she’s been getting salt chucked at her in prison.
Arthur's step-mother whinges to prison bosses she is being 'attacked' by inmates throwing SALT | Daily Mail Online
I’m not trained in psychoanalysis. But heard about a theory from Lacan about the three worlds our minds inhabit, the Symbolic, the Imaginary, and the Real. In that video outside the we see TH has just left the Imaginary and entered the Real. There is no symbolic language for him to represent what he’s thinking. He is mute. Game over. Meanwhile ET is fully in the Imaginary world and blathering on with lies.Just watched the bodycam video again, looking at TH in the background, he doesnt look worried about Arthur, he doesnt even look in towards the house to check. Its actually so weird he wasnt in the house right beside Arthur, or would he have been told to step outside?
To me he looks like a man who is thinking **** how are we going to explain all the bruises on Arthurs body now and his weight loss to the hospital.
I can see how full on ET is after watching this clip, she was nearly convincing me Arthur knocked himself out they way she was going on, even though i know full well it was her. Nasty nasty piece of work.
It’s phenomenal. Every movement he knew would hurt and he did it anyway. He is a saint. I hope his heroism and raw courage is formally recognised in some way. Announced in Parliament, combined with an official apology and acknowledgement that the State failed him. And award him a proper war medal or something, because a war is what he fought in.It looks like she pointed it happened in the video by the door hallway?
So it looks like he was trying to escape out of the door, and she stopped him. She admitted he was trying to get out the door to the cellmate.
Brave of Arthur who tried to escape as weak and frail as he would have been, he tried to get away. Knowing that if caught she would have hurt him more
It looks like she pointed it happened in the video by the door hallway?
So it looks like he was trying to escape out of the door, and she stopped him. She admitted he was trying to get out the door to the cellmate.
Brave of Arthur who tried to escape as weak and frail as he would have been, he tried to get away. Knowing that if caught she would have hurt him more
Yes, I had, wrongly, assumed that as secondary party he could only be guilty of encouraging the crime that was actually committed, the intent to commit that crime. It doesn't make a lot of sense to me that he encouraged her to do such harm to Arthur that she would unintentionally cause his death, when his messages explicitly stated terms that had to do with his ending. Could he foresee that physical assaults would end him? I don't have the same qualms the jury had, he said in court Arthur was too fragile and weak for a day at school.They should keep both of them in solitary confinement so they do not get harmed by other inmates and are able to sue the prison service. She should not be given the opportunity to harm herself either, she should serve every second of her long sentence and I hope she has a miserable time. The same goes for him too.
I’m struggling to understand why he has only been convicted of manslaughter.
According to a UK Solicitor’s website: “Manslaughter is when a person unlawfully kills another human, but he/she did not intend to kill OR cannot be held responsible for his/her actions.” If he sent a text telling her to “just end him” and was a willing participant in torturing Arthur on an ongoing basis making no attempt to protect him then he is just as complicit in Arthur’s murder as she is.
I don’t understand why the sentences in the UK are so weak for horrific crimes like torturing and murdering an innocent and defenceless child. I’m sure there would be widespread public support for whole life prison terms if you torture and/or murder a child with no exceptions.