I'm guessing she did have a say but he wasn't in agreement, and vice versa, until now.So why didnt she have a say in the matter of funeral?
I'm guessing she did have a say but he wasn't in agreement, and vice versa, until now.So why didnt she have a say in the matter of funeral?
It seems that Mr Richmond is the most effective lawyer of all.I'm guessing she did have a say but he wasn't in agreement, and vice versa, until now.
This kind of evil is the master of humiliation.Can you imagine how embarrassing that must have been for him?!
This kind of evil is the master of humiliation.
Did she ever say her reason for not letting him go to the loo by himself? You would think TH would just step in here, it was like he had washed his hands of him, wasnt even bothered showering him, so cruelCan you imagine how embarrassing that must have been for him?!
That’s what I think the cctv was set up for. To monitor Arthur when he was alone in the living room.I read somewhere in the case, that she would always accompany him to the toilet, he didn't even have peace and time alone to go to the toilet. I think it was to stop him drinking tap water.
Both ladies (cough, cough) convicted murderers. Not much of a talent.Nevertheless, he managed to attract the attention of ladies
Hidden talents?
Dont need to remind me hahaBoth ladies (cough, cough) convicted murderers. Not much of a talent.
Can't for the life of me understand why he had the final say on this or his family. Regardless of Olivia being in prison, she had never hurt him. Her statement to the court shown a loving educated woman who nurtered in her son a love of literature and learning and then the poor poor boy was sent to live with his uneducated bullying father and his rough girlfriend. It's beyond tragic.
By "guilty of bias" do you mean an average Joe/Jane or a specialist/professional?Everyone is guilty of bias though. If you saw a spotlessly clean house with children’s toys, nicely decorated bedrooms with beds in them, food in the cupboards, no evidence of drug or alcohol abuse, you wouldn’t automatically assume “child abuser lives here”. We are all conditioned to accept what we see on the surface.
Not acceptable for social workers who ought to have extensive training and know that tidy houses, no drugs/alcohol issues etc etc does NOT automatically equal a non abusive household.Everyone is guilty of bias though. If you saw a spotlessly clean house with children’s toys, nicely decorated bedrooms with beds in them, food in the cupboards, no evidence of drug or alcohol abuse, you wouldn’t automatically assume “child abuser lives here”. We are all conditioned to accept what we see on the surface.
Everyone is guilty of bias though. If you saw a spotlessly clean house with children’s toys, nicely decorated bedrooms with beds in them, food in the cupboards, no evidence of drug or alcohol abuse, you wouldn’t automatically assume “child abuser lives here”. We are all conditioned to accept what we see on the surface.
I find it absolutely shocking and horrifying that a sadistic sperm donor who is involved in the torture and murder of his own child has the legal right to give permission for him to have a funeral and be buried. A monster like him should have no legal right to make a decision like that or have the ability to grant permission for their child’s body to be released for a funeral.
Does mean that a monster like him could refuse to release their child’s body and Arthur could have stayed in the morgue indefinitely? The law needs to be changed regarding this as well
I am glad Arthur is finally going to have a funeral and be laid to rest. I hope a funeral director steps in and he is given the funeral he deserves and not just a basic funeral paid for by the government. His funeral will be absolutely heartbreaking but I am sure he will be given the send off he deserves with people lining the streets.
The interview with Arthur’s Grandmother (His birth Mother’s Mum) on Good Morning Britain this morning was very distressing. It is clear she loved him and cared for him very much and I wish she could have looked after him. She reported the bruising he had and the police and child protective services failed him.
Arthur’s Grandmother said the police took no action after they visited the property and they took no action because they said the home was “neat and tidy”. She said she challenged them and said to them “Do you think all child abusers live in tidy houses?” It is totally wrong that there is an assumption that child abuse only happens in filthy homes with terrible conditions full of rubbish etc. Child abuse can happen in any home.
This is the first time I’m hearing that Arthur maternal grandma had also called social services and the police…..
is this new information?!!
I thought all along it was Joanna and Daniel Hughes…