UK - child kept in a drawer for 2 years, 11 months

QB2022

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2022
Messages
757
Reaction score
8,836
  • #1

So many questions.

A mother who claims she did not know she was pregnant until she gave birth hid her child from her family and partner for almost three years - keeping the youngster in a drawer under her bed.

The mum, who cannot be named for legal reasons, kept the little girl secret for two years and 11 months, feeding her on a diet of Weetabix and water through a syringe and only letting her out when nobody else was around.

During that time she continued to look after her other children, taking them to and from school and celebrating birthdays and Christmases.

The girl - known as Child A - was eventually discovered after the woman's partner - who had been forbidden from going upstairs alone in the Cheshire home - heard noises, and entered the bedroom.

Describing what she did as "wicked beyond belief" Honorary Recorder of Chester Judge Steven Everett jailed the mother for seven and a half years after she admitted child cruelty.

He said: “To my mind what you did totally defies belief.

“You starved that little girl of any love, any proper affection, any proper attention, any interaction with others, a proper diet, much-needed medical attention.”


[Mod edit. Too much of article posted]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #2
I am unable to process this. I'm not going to try.
 
  • #3
Why do women still place their partners over their kids? she was scared of her boyfriends reaction to her pregnancy. unbelievable
 
  • #4
It is also incredibly telling that he wasn't allowed to be at the house alone?
 
  • #5
Saw this on the news this morning. Heart breaking beyond belief. Thank God she didn't kill her but what a terrible Existence of nothing every day. I pray this baby can overcome this and have the happiest life.
 
  • #6
Why can't the "mother" be named for legal reasons, now that she has been found guilty and sentenced?
 
  • #7
Why can't the "mother" be named for legal reasons, now that she has been found guilty and sentenced?
Because that would identify the victim, presumably.
 
  • #8
Because that would identify the victim, presumably.

True. Thanks.

One thing I do wonder, how did no one else in the house never hear or notice anything? It's strange to me that her boyfriend didn't figure this out. She had a private locked bedroom? Boggles the mind.

This child will be disabled for life because of her. She could have left the baby at a safe haven. Her sentence is lenient, because the baby suffered daily.
 
  • #9
Saw this on the news this morning. Heart breaking beyond belief. Thank God she didn't kill her but what a terrible Existence of nothing every day. I pray this baby can overcome this and have the happiest life.
That would be nice, but having lost those critical years makes it practically impossible.
 
  • #10
True. Thanks.

One thing I do wonder, how did no one else in the house never hear or notice anything? It's strange to me that her boyfriend didn't figure this out. She had a private locked bedroom? Boggles the mind.

This child will be disabled for life because of her. She could have left the baby at a safe haven. Her sentence is lenient, because the baby suffered daily.
Safe havens don't exist in the UK. We've never really had the same problem (abandoned babies) on the scale the US has (probably because of free healthcare, easily accessible contraception and abortion, and comprehensive sex ed in schools) so there's no reason to have them.

I agree the sentence is lenient. The first few years of someone's life are so vitally important for brain development in so many ways. Mental, emotional, etc... reminds me a bit of 'feral' children raised without social interaction that never become 'normal' adults. This poor baby will likely never have a normal life, her life has been stolen from her by her mother's actions. That should count for more than seven years.
 
  • #11
Safe havens don't exist in the UK.

There might not be formal "baby boxes," but she could have informally left her somewhere safe.
 
  • #12
Why can't the "mother" be named for legal reasons, now that she has been found guilty and sentenced?
To protect the victim and other children. It won't be to protect the mum at all, fortunately.
 
  • #13
beyond sickening
is the 'boyfriend' the baby's father?
 
  • #14
I thought nothing could surprise me anymore, apparently I was wrong. I just can’t wrap my head around it.
 
  • #15
But other people, including other children, lived in this same house all this time? Obvious question concerns the fact that babies cry, a lot, sometimes very loudly, and not on any schedule! And no one noticed a VERY sudden weight loss at time of birth? Not even her boyfriend?

And what was it about this weird situation that caused the need to feed the baby only crackers and water? And why through a syringe? And when she was off with the other children celebrating holidays, etc., she just left the baby all alone? Or were they saying she left the baby all alone basically all the time? The baby would cry non-stop left alone, I would think.

I wonder how the health of the baby is now and bad he or she was when discovered.
 
  • #16
But other people, including other children, lived in this same house all this time? Obvious question concerns the fact that babies cry, a lot, sometimes very loudly, and not on any schedule! And no one noticed a VERY sudden weight loss at time of birth? Not even her boyfriend?

And what was it about this weird situation that caused the need to feed the baby only crackers and water? And why through a syringe? And when she was off with the other children celebrating holidays, etc., she just left the baby all alone? Or were they saying she left the baby all alone basically all the time? The baby would cry non-stop left alone, I would think.

I wonder how the health of the baby is now and bad he or she was when discovered.

I wondered about the syringe too but then saw in the article that the little girl had an unrepaired cleft palate.
 
  • #17
The article from Granada Reports states:-

Chester Crown Court heard when she was discovered Child A was the size of a eight-month-old, despite being just a few weeks away from her third birthday.

Her hair was matted and she had dirty nails, she had a significant nappy rash, swollen ankles and red limbs due to spending so much time in the divan bed drawer.


This poor child. How could a mother do that whilst presumably caring adequately for her other children?! It's a miracle that she survived I would imagine. 7.5 years does not feel nearly long enough.
 
  • #18
I wonder how the health of the baby is now and bad he or she was when discovered.
(Shortened for focus)

The babies health is not good as I'm sure you can imagine.

the child had a developmental age of nought to 10 months when she was first taken into hospital and was significantly malnourished and dehydrated. The child, discovered at the family home in Cheshire, was found with matted hair, deformities and rashes


The baby also has a clef palate which makes me wonder if that's one of the reasons she hid the child. Shame? It just makes me wonder.

The court heard the woman did not seek medical assistance for the child’s cleft palate
 
  • #19
  • #20
Why can't the "mother" be named for legal reasons, now that she has been found guilty and sentenced?
To protect the identity of her children.

The court was told the mother, who cannot be named to protect the identity of her children, concealed the baby’s presence from her siblings by hiding her in the drawer of her divan bed and kept her secret from her partner, who often stayed at the house.

Mother kept neglected baby hidden in drawer under her bed for three years
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
128
Guests online
1,653
Total visitors
1,781

Forum statistics

Threads
632,354
Messages
18,625,240
Members
243,108
Latest member
enigmapoodle
Back
Top