- Joined
- Apr 27, 2022
- Messages
- 4,248
- Reaction score
- 31,504
BBM, but, they were trying to hide something - they were trying to hide the fact that the baby died. We know that, because when the police asked them where the baby was, they refused to answer. They did keep very quiet about her whereabouts, even under intense pressure/police interview. That speaks again to self-preservation, not distress or incapacity.
We don't bury bodies in order to hide them, we bury them to lay them to rest. We bury them to show respect, and to prevent them from openly decomposing, which to a grieving person would heighten their distress.
Stuffing Victoria's body in a plastic bag, covering her up with rubbish, and putting the bag in a random shed seems IMO like *more* of an attempt to hide something than burying her would have been.
Unless they were psychotically disturbed. When you say 'incapable' do you mean to say that they didn't understand that she was dead, or that they had lost their mental capacity to the point where they wanted to 'keep her' even though she had died? That would make more sense to me, of their actions, but then - are they mentally fit to stand trial?
And it still doesn't quite explain why they tried to conceal the FACT of her death from the authorities. If the police had not found the body, then IMO - pure speculation - I believe they would have pretended that they had given her to people traffickers. Pure imagination on my part, but I wonder if that had been part of their plan, when they were on the run.
I agree with these ideas.
Maybe they had life struggles sufficient to make them anti-authoritarian and mistrustful of all institutions. They could have been in awful trauma about the removal of their other children. Plus they could have felt frantic and paranoid to the point of all that being formal mental illness and 'folie a deux'.
They could have been beside themselves with grief and shock when the baby died and lost their minds completely. They had seemingly been long term freezing cold, sleep deprived, lacking all forms of sanitation, and probably malnourished.
Taking all that into account, I'd be prepared to accept they'd both become severely mentally unwell and in a psychiatric emergency for both. That could go some way to explain. However, at no point has that argument been made by their defence teams.
CM has gone through five different barristers from different law firms. I think she's still on number five but it could be six if there's been a change of representation. Not one of them has used poor mental health or psychiatric diagnosis as a defence or argument against being legally culpable and to explain the callous actions after the baby died. I think that speaks for itself. JMO MOO