UK - Constance Marten & Mark Gordon charged, Newborn (found deceased), Bolton Greater Manchester, 5 Jan 2023 #4

Status
Not open for further replies.
I often suspect people are quite heavily medicated in prison and this can result in a shift in demeanour, could be wrong.
no that doesn't happen. They will only be allowed medication that was already prescribed before they go into prison or anything that the prison doctors may prescribe for a new medical condition diagnosed by prison doctors. People are only medicated against their will it they have been sectioned under the mental health act and even then it will be strictly monitored
 
The pair were told off by custody officers for communicating during a court hearing today. During the short hearing, the couple were seen smiling at one another and interacting.

The custody officers were seen telling the couple to stop interacting on at least two occasions.




 
no that doesn't happen. They will only be allowed medication that was already prescribed before they go into prison or anything that the prison doctors may prescribe for a new medical condition diagnosed by prison doctors. People are only medicated against their will it they have been sectioned under the mental health act and even then it will be strictly monitored

I didn't mean against their wishes. Just that a lot of people arrive in custody in chaotic or disheveled states and often they either have longstanding mental health problems that they've not been attending to and / or they're in withdrawal from frequent substance use. So I think that plenty of prisoners need medication once they're in the custody of the authorities and have access to a doctor. Not in any way saying this is the case here with CM or MG -but- I do often think to myself that the general demeanour of defendants could maybe be explained by medications. Especially when people are accused in the media of 'appearing emotionless' in the face of their alleged crimes / sentencing.
 
The pair are due back in the dock at the Old Bailey on Friday, where they may be asked to enter pleas to the charges.

the couple are accused of manslaughter by having “unlawfully killed baby Victoria”.

It is said the birth was concealed between January 27 and February 27,
and they are accused of “doing an act or acts by concealing the death of baby Victoria which had a tendency to pervert the course of public justice.”

Marten is being represented in the legal proceedings by leading barrister Lewis Power KC.




"They are due to enter pleas on August 18, with a trial set for January 2, 2024."

Why on earth has such a long delay been scheduled for the trial?
 
The pair were told off by custody officers for communicating during a court hearing today. During the short hearing, the couple were seen smiling at one another and interacting.

The custody officers were seen telling the couple to stop interacting on at least two occasions.




They are the principals for the defence and they should be allowed to sit next to each other and confer as they feel necessary. If there is a reason to the contrary - and I can't think of what it might be - it should be told to the judge who can then rule appropriately.
 
Well, I'm surprised that there's such a long delay to the plea hearing. If they both pleaded guilty there wouldn't be any need for a trial, would there? Unlikely, perhaps, but who knows for sure.
The judge's assumption in setting a provisional trial date is that they will plead not guilty (to at least one charge), which quite possibly has already been indicated by the defence to the prosecution.
 
What is "SUSWM"?

At a rough guess, I would say it indicates whichever Magistrates Court they attended for their initial hearing.
If you look at court lists, there are many similar initials against each case.

They attended Crawley Magistrates, which is Sussex.

Just so this is completely clear - this is MOO and JMO -
 
The pair were told off by custody officers for communicating during a court hearing today. During the short hearing, the couple were seen smiling at one another and interacting.

The custody officers were seen telling the couple to stop interacting on at least two occasions.




Imagine going to court for allegedly being responsible for the death of a baby and treating like a social meet-up.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
An initial post-mortem examination was unable to establish the cause of the child's death and it is thought tests are ongoing.


An initial post-mortem examination was unable to establish the cause of the child's death and it is thought tests are ongoing.


Investigators have not publicly established how she died, but believe it may have happened "some time" before the remains were discovered on 1 March.

 
A couple were 'told off' for smiling at each other during a court appearance in which they were told they will face a trial early next year over the death of their baby daughter.

During today's hearing the pair were seen smiling at each other, causing the custody officers to tell them to stop interacting with one another.








Both were reprimanded by custody officers for interacting with one another on at least two occasions after exchanging smiles


 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
100
Guests online
625
Total visitors
725

Forum statistics

Threads
625,467
Messages
18,504,361
Members
240,808
Latest member
zoeep
Back
Top