What baffles me is why they did things together when they were so distinctive as a couple and easy to identify that way. The poor mugshot of MG and lack of other images of him meant he could have gone to shops relatively anonymously.
I think proof of address and one photo ID is what’s neededI think it would be hard to withdraw cash in branch without a passport or driving licence. Perhaps she still had a driving licence though.
Shows how symbiotic they were ? They didn't want interference from anyone .What baffles me is why they did things together when they were so distinctive as a couple and easy to identify that way. The poor mugshot of MG and lack of other images of him meant he could have gone to shops relatively anonymously.
Possibly also raises the spectre of coercive control again, though who may have been controlling whom is even less clear now than it was right back at the beginning imo.Shows how symbiotic they were ? They didn't want interference from anyone .
Possibly next week if this is anything to go by:Will we hear from social work during this trial?
Yes I often think about this! He could've left her all warm and wrapped up with the baby whilst he went out to get supplies. The "other-race effect" meant he was much less likely to be recognised than her as well as the lack of public images of him.What baffles me is why they did things together when they were so distinctive as a couple and easy to identify that way. The poor mugshot of MG and lack of other images of him meant he could have gone to shops relatively anonymously.
This was separate to CM though. I think this was more about:MG seems to act like, and get treated by CM (not LE) like he is her treasured pet dog. A dog does not leave a loving mistress, imo, speculation,
''Constance Marten's boyfriend lay on the floor during questioning and claimed he was being treated like a 'dog' as the fugitive couple refused to tell police any details about their missing baby, court hears''
Perhaps she was trying to stash cash? As she couldn’t just withdraw one large sum?If that's the case then even more mysterious where the money is going because a week later they took out another 2k.
It's possibly they were spending the money on provisions, when the car blew up, it had lots of stuff in it. Plus, we know 2k went up in smoke.If that's the case then even more mysterious where the money is going because a week later they took out another 2k.
I don't think anyone can answer that question.'Just to refresh my mind on how much money you'd need per month to live on in 2016/7 , has someone in here noted exactly when and where CM & MG began living together ?
'Just to refresh my mind on how much money you'd need per month to live on in 2016/7 , has someone in here noted exactly when and where CM & MG began living together ?
Looking at CMs fb and the timeline re the first pregnancy, my best guess is the latter half of 2016 to early 2017.'Just to refresh my mind on how much money you'd need per month to live on in 2016/7 , has someone in here noted exactly when and where CM & MG began living together ?
'Just to refresh my mind on how much money you'd need per month to live on in 2016/7 , has someone in here noted exactly when and where CM & MG began living together ?
Makes me think I live in a different world ,not a small rural town in the NW !How long is a piece of string?
However, at that time I was living in a 1 bed flat in Clapham which was £1300 + bills, which was about the going rate at the time.
Makes me think I live in a different world ,not a small rural town in the NW !
My rent on a HA 2b/r flat has just gone up to £ £368 pcm.