MidsummersDay
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2016
- Messages
- 1,194
- Reaction score
- 1




Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
On the mast radius at BM is the radius 3 miles rather than 3 km? Or is it only 3 km because it is directional? As has been suggested it does look like the phone data may now be analysed further. It does seem to be the only evidence. Also, is BSE mast the same radius 3-5km?
Good question. I don't know but someone will. I think it still pings even when turned off though and it only died at 8 a.m. possibly due to battery failure or damage.does the ping mean a call or text was made from his phone?
The camera rotates 9 positions in 4.5 minutes, 2 positions on Horseshoe. C was on cam going in so there was opportunity for him to leave on foot when the cam was pointing back up Brentgovel. Not only is it possible but that is only around a 25% chance of being seen leaving on foot or in a vehicle IMO. If he hasn't left then he must be still there .
Were his lights on in the previous image? Also it was stated he was "cycling around Cornhill" in the narrative with previous pic. Is this still near the grapes but now facing the opposite direction. I am just going by the triangular road sign on the passenger side. Also the MSM stated he was talking to taxi drivers (plural)."Image 8 is person on bike. Please note that it is just the cyclist that needs to be identified."
Interesting wording? Suggests to me the car driver is known or has been spoken to...and if so, DOESN'T know the cyclist?
JMO
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk![]()
Also notice NO cycle lights. That suggest to me that he and his bike are local. Minimum exposure to the authorities etc...?
JMO
If the cyclist is a student or a seasonal worker, the person may not be still in the area either."Image 8 is person on bike. Please note that it is just the cyclist that needs to be identified."
Interesting wording? Suggests to me the car driver is known or has been spoken to...and if so, DOESN'T know the cyclist?
JMO
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk![]()
Also notice NO cycle lights. That suggest to me that he and his bike are local. Minimum exposure to the authorities etc...?
JMO
Good question. I don't know but someone will. I think it still pings even when turned off though and it only died at 8 a.m. possibly due to battery failure or damage.
Were his lights on in the previous image? Also it was stated he was "cycling around Cornhill" in the narrative with previous pic. Is this still near the grapes but now facing the opposite direction. I am just going by the triangular road sign on the passenger side. Also the MSM stated he was talking to taxi drivers (plural).
Erm.... who's that? Have I missed something?
The specialist RAF teams are joining police and Suffolk Lowland Search and Rescue volunteers to carry out line searching of wooded areas on possible routes Corrie may have tried to walk home.What?????? I am so baffled.
You are always on this thread and based on your last few posts that you have written about CCTV and whether he could leave on foot or not it seems you have no understanding of it.
Either that or I am being dumb and am not understanding your comments.
Yes - of course he could have walked out of the horseshoe area (the area which he walked off camera into) without being seen on CCTV.
The rotating camera could have missed him walking out of there....
But he STILL would be stuck inside a small area in which all exits are covered off by CCTV. So no there is a 100% chance of him being seen leaving on foot.
Unless he left after 4pm.
A person of interest that we've been asked to identify. There is a much clearer version however than this one.
How have I missed this, did I skip a thread or something?! Just checked it out on findcorrie, thanks for reposting, I'd have been oblivious!!
It's on the police website. He is one of a few new cctv images police have released of people they would like to speak to. They are not "persons of interests" at least as I understand that term.How have I missed this, did I skip a thread or something?! Just checked it out on findcorrie, thanks for reposting, I'd have been oblivious!!