UK - (Former prince) Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor accused of underage sexual relationship, 1999-2002 *settled* #2

  • #1,581
Last edited:
  • #1,582
  • #1,583
I read that most of the staff did not want to go to Sandringham because they have homes/families in Windsor and/or they are close to retirement age and do not wish to up sticks and move.

Best they hire some locals in Norfolk, has to be someone who’d make the guy a sandwich now and again.

It would not surprise me to find out that Andrew is ‘not well’.

The RF has often gone to great lengths to hide certain illnesses.

If he’s gone barmy, it won’t be made public. IMO, MOO
They refused to work with him because he is notoriously verbally abusive to staff.
 
  • #1,584
  • #1,585
I do not know who the "expert" is, who claims that William as a monarch "is adamant his uncle should face a police inquiry...", but if that "expert" believes that a monarch of today has any say in whether the police should open an inquiry, they doesn't seem to be familiar with the British legal and political system. William is not going to become an absolute monarch, whether he, or any editor of Royalist newsletters dream of.

(I haven't read the article, as I refuse to 'feed' that tabloid.)
Why do you think there wasn't a police investigation into a known 17 year old sex trafficking victim, travelling with a known sex trafficker, accusing Andrew of rape? It's unfathomable if he wasn't a royal.

I suspect this is less a case of royal interference and more a matter of institutional deference to the royal family on the part of the police. Which I think unfortunately exists.

I think William letting it be known he would be happy for police to investigate claims against the royal family is only a good thing.
 
Last edited:

Guardians Monthly Goal

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
439
Guests online
6,131
Total visitors
6,570

Forum statistics

Threads
640,440
Messages
18,760,439
Members
244,669
Latest member
gumbyguts_
Back
Top