- Joined
- Jul 11, 2016
- Messages
- 513
- Reaction score
- 4,746
The Sun (if it is a valid source), reports this evening that Huntley’s mother has agreed to switch off his life support.
This has been reported in other papers including the telegraph and Mirror. The sun is a permitted source.The Sun (if it is a valid source), reports this evening that Huntley’s mother has agreed to switch off his life support.
Thank you for confirming and for the link, I’m somewhat surprised, I did think they would take longer over this. It sounds like he is not expected to survive and will die shortly, I would assume it was quite clear to doctors that he would not live.This has been reported in other papers including the telegraph and Mirror. The sun is a permitted source.
![]()
Ian Huntley has life support 'switched off' and is 'hours from death'
Soham murderer Ian Huntley had his life support switched off today and is hours away from dying after he was brutally attacked in HMP Frankland, it is claimedwww.mirror.co.uk
The law and medical practice will vary between jurisdictions but the position I stated earlier is what is done in the UK. The doctors make a decision whether to continue or withdraw treatment based on their assessment of the patient's chance of recovery and/or quality of life. In the vast majority of such cases, next of kin accept that judgment and treatment is ended and the patient dies. The famous cases which hit the news, eg Alfie Evans and Charlie Gard, do so precisely because the next of kin vehemently oppose the doctors' proposals and it leads to a lengthy and expensive legal case.I'd say there is a difference between 'not provide treatment which they consider futile or not to be in the interests of the patient', and to take a patient off from life support, if they are already in treatment. Why I claim this, is because I had to make a decision, whether I wanted a relative to be put on life support, or if I'd want that doctors would 'not provide treatment'. I chose the second alternative.
If somebody committed a similar crime today, they would get a whole life tariff. The law around sentencing for murder has changed somewhat since the early noughties.I always thought he should have got a whole life sentence. I know it was unlikely he'd be released after 40 years but it's relief that he can't hurt anyone again now.
I heard its got a cracking stiff upper lip.I was hopeful he would survive with all his faculties but without any hearing or vision whatsoever & that he would live a long life in that condition never knowing what happened to him & never seeing/talking to another person again, just a total blank void in misery, fear & confusion for another 30 odd years. That would have been nightmarish but still a billion times milder than what he did to those girls & their families.
I just hope the IRON BAR didn't suffer too much.
His care would have cost the British taxpayers millions of pounds for 30 years of care.I was hopeful he would survive with all his faculties but without any hearing or vision whatsoever & that he would live a long life in that condition never knowing what happened to him & never seeing/talking to another person again, just a total blank void in misery, fear & confusion for another 30 odd years. That would have been nightmarish but still a billion times milder than what he did to those girls & their families.
I just hope the iron bar didn't suffer too much.