Have a look here, @Alyce . See what you can get it up to.I am not sure what sentence the Judge could give if he is only found guilty of rape. Too high and there will inevitably be an appeal.
Rape – Sentencing
Last edited:
Have a look here, @Alyce . See what you can get it up to.I am not sure what sentence the Judge could give if he is only found guilty of rape. Too high and there will inevitably be an appeal.
It might have been just one juror all along, we'll see. I think we'll know by 4 or thereabouts.
I think that might be rather presumptuous? Maybe you have a group of people who don't want to convict someone of murder unless they feel they have been convinced beyond all reasonable doubt that a murder took place? People who are willing to put their emotions to one side and consider only the facts. People who are willing to make inferences where there is no other logical explanation but are not willing to convict on speculation? I don't consider that stubborn, nor extremely liberal, just sensible.I guess you only need a few stubborn extremely opinionated or extremely liberal people in a group to cause an issue. JMO
and a fresh jury I presume?
There is a majority of women.I agree. I completely believe he is guilty, but just one of the things you’ve listed could have been what an unsure juror/s really needed to reach a murder verdict.
I imagined more complex evidence would have been presented by the prosecution, did the police not do thorough enough leg work ? I’m convinced he must have awful internet searches relating to asphyxiation and rape at the very least.
Really didn’t expect the trial to remind me of how ‘basic’ Lindsay Birbeck’s was. Although the outcome there was guilty.
whatever the outcome now, I’m still hoping the judge will give him life on the rape charge. In this country, we know a murder sentence can still mean very little in terms of serving time.
It might have been just one juror all along, we'll see. I think we'll know by 4 or thereabouts.
I think that might be rather presumptuous? Maybe you have a group of people who don't want to convict someone of murder unless they feel they have been convinced beyond all reasonable doubt that a murder took place? People who are willing to put their emotions to one side and consider only the facts. People who are willing to make inferences where there is no other logical explanation but are not willing to convict on speculation? I don't consider that stubborn, nor extremely liberal, just sensible.
To be honest if I wanted to dispose of a body and there was a river on my doorstep I wouldn't need to research it.For me I wish there had been one more piece of evidence to close the deal
Just some blood on his clothes ?
Some Internet searches on bodies in rivers?
Previous violence ?
A liking for auto asphyxiation?
The sort of things in other cases that tip the balance
There is a majority of women.
Personally I don't judge people on their gender at all. Everyone is an individual.My Partner was on jury duty a few years ago and it was a rape trial, he said the female members of the jury were dreadful relating to the rape charges, he was disgusted with their attitude towards the victim, luckily the guy was found guilty
I was talking about my personal feelings too. I didn't find it offensive. But I know if it were me I'd want my daughter's murder fully acknowledged and punished. I'd want justice.I was talking about my personal feelings, not assuming those of her family.
I did attempt to acknowledge that her family will likely feel very differently but its impossible (for me) to say how they feel or what their thoughts may be.
Sorry if you find my thoughts offensive, that wasn't the intention and I tried to be as sensitive as I could in my wording.
I hate to say this but I think perhaps the majority of men on the jury might go some way to answering for this deadlock.
Agreed, it's invidious to draw conclusions based on gender.Personally I don't judge people on their gender at all. Everyone is an individual.
Exactly this!Absolutely, I think of a few people I know and if they were ever to serve on a jury ...yikes![]()
Personally I don't judge people on their gender at all. Everyone is an individual.
I was talking about my personal feelings too. I didn't find it offensive. But I know if it were me I'd want my daughter's murder fully acknowledged and punished. I'd want justice.
I agree. It won't feel like nearly enough for me. He is the reason Libby is dead.
I am not sure what sentence the Judge could give if he is only found guilty of rape. Too high and there will inevitably be an appeal.
I don't think I've refreshed a page so much in my life!!No matter how many times I explain to the dogs, they just simply cannot understand that we cannot go for a walk yet ....
There's also the "Dangerousness" factor (step 5). He's already been described as dangerous by the previous judge.I get a figure of lowest possible being 13 years, the highest 19 years. That is before I add on aggravating factors, of which I can find 6 - and there may be more that I just cannot know about - eg; threats, use of weapon
I can find no mitigating factors.
Still a pitifully low figure imo