- Joined
- Nov 30, 2013
- Messages
- 13,432
- Reaction score
- 65,718
Actually have the police ever mentioned the spidercam?
Nope. Except with the inference that Libby was last seen at 12:09 which so happens to be the exact same time the car pulled away.
Actually have the police ever mentioned the spidercam?
Oh. The video I watched loinked up thread I had seen before - it was the reporter who mentioned the cyclist and the car.
Actually have the police ever mentioned the spidercam?
Or he may have stopped simply because he saw she couldn't stand straight, appeared intoxicated, wearing a skirt, young and alone. Being a wise individual equated a high risk to her safety, and being of good morals stepped in to check....are you okay?, Can I help....ect. My point being, she may not have necessarily fallen, to rouse concern.I was just about to say that. If Greybeard was caught on a mobile cam, then it doesn't follow that PR (if it was he) would be seen at the same spot.
I've said before - I think the most likely reason that Greybeard stopped is that Libby had fallen over. She might even have fallen in the road itself. We know from witnesses that she fell over earlier, and it was an icy night. There must have been a very strong reason for stopping the car, and seeing an interaction between two people is unlikely to have been enough.
Brilliant!Going outside is safe. Committing sexually deviant crimes such as voyeurism, masturbating in the street and burglary and then being the last person to see a vulnerable young girl alive is a different kettle of fish.
The original ITV footage certainly reported 20 minutes of suspicious activity.
Quite! If you want to look at the sentencing guidelines for the offences currently charged them see SentencingBrilliant!![]()
The video I linked a few pages back, the commentator states suspicious activity as they introduce the footage, but no reference to 20 mins.I definitely do not recall the word suspicious being used at all. Would be very interested to see that footage if anyone has it, please.
Here's the ITV footage: ITV News exclusive: CCTV captures car activity minutes before student Libby Squire was last seen in Hull
The reporter says "the car was here for approximately 20 minutes before it drove off down this road at exactly the same time that's it's believed Libby disappeared"
Google Maps
Just googled Paull and it doesn't look that hard to get the shore of that huge river.
Town End Road, for example.
Well, it's possible of course, but men tend to avoid getting involved in those sort of situations with young women, I don't think I need to explain why.Or he may have stopped simply because he saw she couldn't stand straight, appeared intoxicated, wearing a skirt, young and alone. Being a wise individual equated a high risk to her safety, and being of good morals stepped in to check....are you okay?, Can I help....ect. My point being, she may not have necessarily fallen, to rouse concern.
Are you telling me to be quiet @Lincoln34 ? I am confused by your comment...Are you saying I can not show appreciation of or commend a comment because you don't agree with it? If so why not respond to the ORIGINAL comment, instead of my appreciation of it? Also to respond 'Quite!' with exclamation marks, to a simple worded reply of 'Brilliant' from me, is a very hostile introduction to each other.Quite! If you want to look at the sentencing guidelines for the offences currently charged them see Sentencing
Innocent until proven guilty is the cornerstone of our system, but, if proven - serious offences.
The video I linked a few pages back, the commentator states suspicious activity as they introduce the footage, but no reference to 20 mins.
No. I meant I agreed with youAre you telling me to be quiet @Lincoln34 ? I am confused by your comment...Are you saying I can not show appreciation of or commend a comment because you don't agree with it? If so why not respond to the ORIGINAL comment, instead of my appreciation of it? Also to respond 'Quite!' with exclamation marks, to a simple worded reply of 'Brilliant' from me, is a very hostile introduction to each other.>
No. I meant I agreed with you
I see your point, but am equally confident that many would be comfortable enough to ask on a public road, in front of passing traffic ect if she's okay.Well, it's possible of course, but men tend to avoid getting involved in those sort of situations with young women, I don't think I need to explain why.
Falling, on the other hand, means that she might have been hurt, or if she did fall in the road might cause an accident and result in more serious injury.
Why are you so reluctant to think that she fell? She had already fallen over, and it was probably slippery underfoot anyway.
Like a million times!!!
There are loads of places in Holderness where you can get to the bank of the River Humber and many of them are deserted, which would make it ideal for someone wanting to dispose of a body, except for the fact that the first thing that faces you when you do get there is 20 yards of mud flats before you can even get to the edge of the shallow water.
Someone posted earlier that they were surprised that the body had taken so long to get from Paull across to Grimsby Roads but bear in mind the Humber is tidal both ways, ie the tide flows up it and down it, twice a day, so it's quite conceivable that LS was even washed back upstream, before eventually somehow getting into the deep water channel.
As I said last night, if I wanted to dispose of something into the River Hull (notthe Oak Park area. the best option in my opinion anyway, because that is also full of mud but I don't suppose there was much option but to improvise) out of the way of the prying eyes of CTV, I'd choose somewhere like Wincolmlee to do it from, but even then it's dodgy. Mind you, that assumes that the perpetrator would have to have loaded her back into the car because he would have had to drive there from where he allegedly picked her up.