Found Deceased UK - Libby Squire, 21, last seen outside Welly club, Hull, 31 Jan 2019 #16 *ARREST*

[jamjim]

12:11
Relowicz 'distressed' in the dock
Relowicz has now wiped his nose with a tissue and appears distressed.

 

[Plod]

These facts are horrendous. The fact he followed victims, and was in their houses, and kept going back in some cases.... just shows how frightening and dangerous he is, and gets a kick out of mistreating women. It is all sickening .

 

[CrazyLilBlondie]

Court addition to paragraph above:

The court heard Relowicz, who was working as a butcher at a Malton butcher factory, was arrested on February 2 this year. Police found a ‘scream’ mask in his car.

That is horrific.

 

[JosieJo]

I wondered before if he stupidly went to the police himself to say he picked her up as she was distressed thinking he had been seen ..not thinking his DNA and fingerprints were recorded from previous crimes
Maybe they asked for voluntary DNA etc then realised his past crimes and arrested him

 

[CrazyLilBlondie]

Crying guilty when you see all the evidence stacked up against you at the last minute is hardly credit worthy.

 

[Mommysleuth11]

Well hopefully hes looking at a little over 12 months. I think the judge will go hard on him.

 

[jamjim]

12:16
Relowicz emotional in dock as court mentions his children
He has been in the UK for seven years and got married in 2014. He has two young children. He wants to return to Poland “as soon as is humanly possible”, Mr Brook said.

Relowicz became more upset when his children were mentioned.

It’s the first time we have seen any emotion from him in any of his court appearances.

 

[CoverMeCagney]

But the door was examined a few days before his arrest, as far as I can remember

Quoting self - door of no15 was luminol'd on Sunday 3rd... and I believe PR was arrested the following Wednesday.

I think it's quite possible PR (or his wife) contacted police when the news of Libby broke on the Saturday. If he DIDN'T intentionally kill her, and his "yeah I picked her up but she tried it on and then ran into the night" story is true, then he'd have nothing to hide.

 

[Mommysleuth11]

Wonder why hes so keen to hop off back to Poland. Eeee thats made me irrationally angry.

 

[jamjim]

12:18
Defence submissions now finished
Mr Brook has completed his submissions. The Crown are now seeking a sexual harm prevention order ( SHPO). No details have been read out yet. There are two pages to the order.

The remaining four counts will lie on the court file.

 

[CoverMeCagney]

12:11
Judge: 'Relowicz was on campaign, not a one-off'
Mr Brook says the offending may be “opportunistic” rather than planned, as the prosecution say.

But Judge Jeremy Richardson said: “It’s not a one-off, it’s a campaign.”

Go Jeremy!!

 

[MsMiniSleuth]

Hard to credit that he is a dad. He'd be playing with the kids, putting them to bed - then going out and doing this.

 

[Vermont24]

12:18
Defence submissions now finished
Mr Brook has completed his submissions. The Crown are now seeking a sexual harm prevention order ( SHPO). No details have been read out yet. There are two pages to the order.

The remaining four counts will lie on the court file.

It sounds like the conditions of a SHPO can involve the surrender of any passports.

 

[CoverMeCagney]

The remaining four counts will lie on the court file.

I've no doubt he committed those other 4 counts, too. And probably a few others he's got away with.

Question is, did the dirty creep take a huge step and become a killer?

 

[Sally4x]

Wonder why hes so keen to hop off back to Poland. Eeee thats made me irrationally angry.

Me too and that's my fear - that he goes back to Poland and there isn't any justice for Libby.

 

[MsMiniSleuth]

Sexual Harm Prevention Order (SHPO)

This is part of our information section on understanding your criminal record. Details of other sentences/disposals can be found here.


Who is it issued by and how can I contact them?

Issued by the court – contact the administering court.
Does it involve guilt?

Not necessarily. An order may be made in relation to ‘any person who has been convicted, found not guilty by reason of insanity or found to be under a disability and to have done the act charged or cautioned for an offence listed in either Schedule 3 or 5 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003.’

A SHPO may be given in Court at the time of conviction or imposed by a Court at a later date upon an application made by the police or other agency.
Is it recorded on the Police National Computer (PNC)?

Yes.
Is it classed as a conviction?

Yes. If it is given at conviction it is regarded as a ‘relevant order’.
Length of the order

A SHPO may have effect:-

For a fixed period of at least 5 years
Until further order

How long will it be on my record?

It will remain on the Police National Computer indefinitely and can still be mentioned in future criminal proceedings even after it has become spent.
When does it become spent?

After the length of the order.
When do I have to declare it?

You do not have to declare it after it is spent except for an occupation exempt from the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act, e.g. working with children. Before it is spent, you will need to declare it when asked, to employers, insurance companies and others.
Is it disclosed on DBS checks?

Yes. It will be disclosed on both standard and enhanced checks unless it is eligible for filtering.

Once spent, it will not be disclosed on basic checks.
Do I have the right to appeal and what is the process?

GOV.UK information on appealing a Court decision can be found here.
What can a SHPO include?

A SHPO prohibits an individual from doing anything described in the order. The order may specify that some of its prohibitions have effect until further order and some for a fixed period.

Prohibitions must be necessary for the purpose of:-

Protecting the public or any particular member of the public from sexual harm, or
Protecting children or vulnerable adults generally, or any particular children or vulnerable adults from sexual harm outside of the UK

The decision of the Court of Appeal in R v Smith and Others (2011)[EWVA 117] reinforces the need for the terms of a SHPO to be tailored to the exact requirements of the case. SHPO’s may be used to limit and manage internet use, where it is considered proportionate and necessary to do so. The behaviour prohibited by the order might well be considered unproblematic if exhibited by another member of the public – it is the individual’s previous offending behaviour and subsequent demonstration that they may pose a risk of further such behaviour, which will make them eligible for an order.

The order may include only negative prohibitions, there is no power to impose positive obligations.
Notification requirements

Where a SHPO is made in respect of an individual who was subject to notification requirements under the Sex Offenders Act 1997 immediately before the making of the order, and the individual would cease to be subject to these notification requirements while the order has effect, the individual will remain subject to the notification requirements.
Where a SHPO is made in respect of an individual who was not subject to notification requirements under the Sex Offenders Act 1997 immediately before the making of the order, the order causes the individual to become subject to the notification requirements under the Sex Offenders Act from the making of the order until the order ceases to have effect.

Discharge, variation and renewal of an order

An order cannot be discharged within 5 years of it being made without the agreement of both the individual and the police.

An application can be made to have the order varied by either the police or the individual concerned. It may be necessary to vary the order as a result of:-

deletion of unnecessary conditions
addition of supplementary conditions

A renewal may be necessary where the original order is close to expiry and the police have cause to believe that the individual continues to pose a risk.
Other information

The new Sexual Harm Prevention Order (SHPO) will replace Sexual Offences Prevention Orders (SOPO) and Foreign Travel Order.

When deciding whether to issue a SHPO details of the offence are likely to be a key factor in the courts decision, together with the individual’s previous convictions and the assessment of risk presented by the National Probation Service in any pre-sentence report. The court may take into consideration the range of other options available to it in respect of protecting the public. The court may want to consider:

Would an order minimise the risk of harm to the public, or to any particular members of the public?
Is it proportionate?
Can it be policed effectively?

Any breach of the order is a criminal offence punishable by a maximum of five years imprisonment.

 

[jamjim]

What is a Sexual Harm Prevention Order (SHPO) | Wells Burcombe LLP

Some info on SHPOs

 

[Audiohoney]

Woah. Worse than I expected in the detail. This wasn’t just a guy getting his kicks wanking in public. He liked scaring young women. He liked the reaction. And when he got the frightened response he enjoyed, he didn’t stop. He chased, he followed, he stared back and stood his ground.

I remember suggesting his car boot as a hiding place, and other forum members thinking it couldn’t be because his wife would have travelled in that car (kids / prams etc) But I think he used the spare wheel well in the boot. Not much chance of her looking there.

The mask is sinister.

The more I hear about this guy and his crimes, the more I believe he intentionally escalated with a desire to see real fear in a girl close up. Poor Libby.

 

[JosieJo]

Quoting self - door of no15 was luminol'd on Sunday 3rd... and I believe PR was arrested the following Wednesday.

I think it's quite possible PR (or his wife) contacted police when the news of Libby broke on the Saturday. If he DIDN'T intentionally kill her, and his "yeah I picked her up but she tried it on and then ran into the night" story is true, then he'd have nothing to hide.

My thoughts too

 

[jamjim]

12:18
"The order would bar Relowicz from any area in the UK populated by students. But the judge has ruled that out. The application for the order bars him from ‘masturbating in public’, which the judge says is strange as that’s already a crime."

Hull Live added this part just now