- Joined
- Nov 30, 2013
- Messages
- 13,432
- Reaction score
- 65,718
What Number was that , Cags?!!![]()
![]()
Don't.....
What Number was that , Cags?!!![]()
![]()
Does anyone know whether his wife and children are still in the U.K,or have they returned to Poland?I wonder whether his wife is standing by him, or if she had enough and has left with the children. His poor mum is going to be gutted.
Does anyone else see potentially 3 scratch marks on PRs face in that mugshot?
The charges in full
Burglary
July 29, 2017, to August 1, 2017: Stealing £148 from a property in Chester Avenue.Which are
December 1, 2017, to December 4, 2017: Stealing a PS4 games console and £20 from a property in Lambton Street.
December 7, 2017, to December 20, 2017: Stealing three vibrators from a property in Raglan Street.
August 30, 2018, to September 2, 2018: Stealing Sierra Leone currency and £60 from a property in Manvers Street.
January 25, 2019, to January 28, 2019: Stealing a laptop, Kindle, portable speaker, quantity of sex toys, quantity of clothes, condoms and various photographs from a property in Ventnor Street.
Does anyone else see potentially 3 scratch marks on PRs face in that mugshot?
Where? Under left eye - could be a scar? Right: a spot or such?
Do I remember - I think a rumour somewhere, maybe Hull Live comments at time - reading he did have scratches on face?
I really can't get the idea of her running off into a river.Before I heard Judge Jez I thought he might get 2 years or so (and be out in a few months) but I'm hoping for longer. At the very least he's a nasty pervert who needs to be off our streets. However, I believe he was getting bolder, getting cocky, pushing boundaries... I honestly think he saw a chance to get his kicks from Libby by playing the good samaritan then trying to take things further.
Either she cut and run the minute he laid his grubby mitts on her and ended up in the river.
Or the screams were her being attacked, then she ran off and fell in the river.
Or he attacked and her and "accidentally" killed her to keep her quiet (smothered, strangled etc).
Or he's a cold blooded killer.
I'm somewhere between the middle options, still. I do think they were in that park and I do think the screams were Libby and it was him seen running down the path. Whether he was running because she had vanished into the darkness, or because he'd just thrown her body in the water, or he'd hidden her somewhere to deal with later... I don't know.
I struggle with accidentally killing someone. How would you manage that?
I got to the same section of @Winterbells' attachment as you did, @Cherwell. Apart from the nature of the crimes, the most damning feature for sentencing is the range of crimes, victims, locations and dates. Maybe the gravity of them is not great but there is now an admission that he has committed a range of different crimes. I wonder how many victim statements were tendered to the court! The judge surely has to take this into account when determining a fair and reasonable outcome. Consecutive sentencing could well be invoked. In 48 hrs we'll presumably know.[/QUOTE
So @Cherwell, on Wednesday we interpreted the Principle of Totality fairly accurately. It gave the judge the leverage to effectively give consecutive sentencing for the wide range of different offending. Earlier today when the judge described the series of offences as a "campaign", I guessed what was coming! Also when the full details of offending were read out in court their gravity was worse than realised. I still expect there'll be an appeal over the way the sentence was calculated.
Here's hoping that LE get truth and justice for Libby's family one day (soon?). It still seems that her disappearance led directly to LE catching him via his car registration. Strange that he didn't think to remove the incriminating articles from his car, assuming he knew LE's investigations would include the spidercam car, thought to belong to him.
That's not an accidental act.Put your hand over their mouth and nose to stop them screaming / struggling.
I agree it's a stretch to accidentally run into the river. It's up and over a steep bank and the lights from buildings on the opposite side are reflected on the water (source: Strontium went there at night to check it out)
But not intended to kill.That's not an accidental act.
Manslaughter? Maybe not initially but it would take an amount of time where you'd surely realise what was happening. Time for you to stopBut not intended to kill.
Whats that spot under his nose? Looks really unhealthySeems to be a deep one under his eye. He looks to be a drinker, to me.