Thank you again for the updates,
@jimjam!
My humble opinion on the Defence summing:
1. I'm not so sure that the Defence threw PR under a bus in terms of their reference to the rape charge. I think that there were very limited defence options available, given that PR had already admitted during police interviews and on the stand that sexual contact took place with Libby. Especially given the overwhelming evidence that has her completely intoxicated and not in full faculties that night (witness statements plus CCTV). On the whole, he admitted to having sex with an individual who evidence indicates (in my opinion) was incapable of giving consent.
2. In general, I completely agree that the Defence's choice of focus in terms of suggesting suicide; focusing on Libby's actions etc has been hugely misjudged. The whole tone was completely jarring. I'd be very surprised if at least some members of the jury have been swayed towards a guilty verdict. As much as juries are directed towards evidence, they're also human. That's the reality.
3. My opinion - a much stronger focus would have been to go with an accidental fall into the river. I'm also surprised that Defence didn't attempt to put doubt in the minds of the jury by suggesting another perpetrator (unless he did and I just missed it). Yes, of course anyone can pick holes in both of these versions, but they'd be more believable to the jury IMO.
I know there are those with differing opinions on this thread. I fully respect all of them. They have really made me think!
And I must close by saying again, my heart broke again today reading the summing up when I considered Libby's family. I, too, suffered poor mental health in the past just before and during my student years. It's far from uncommon, and considering some of the poor choices I made, I can't help but feel there but for the grace of God...
I hear all of you on here who have shared your personal stories and I applaud your courage.