If somebody disappears next to a body of water, her belongings are found close by and her dog is in a distressed state near the water, it is not a ‘wild hypothesis’ that she went into the water. It is a reasonable assumption based on the known facts. And it still makes far more sense than any other theory out there, many of which are so implausible they border on lunacy.
Your comment that the police have ‘wasted days and days’ on the assumption that Nicola went into the water implies they haven’t considered any other explanation, which is a massive assumption on your part. Obviously they will be actively looking at other lines of enquiry too, but that doesn’t change the fact that the most likely explanation is still that Nicola went into the water
Just seen Channel 5 special. The partner and family don't think she's in the river and I have thought the same for time.
Having now seen Channel 5 footage of the river - very slow moving - and heard how not very deep it is from the bank, I'm inclined to 100% agree that I don't think she's in the river.
For starters:
1) The time gap from when she was last seen, and partner and police on site - almost 2 hours - is a concern as anything could have happened in that time.
2) The broken CCTVs don't help.
3) Why was the dog lead on the ground separate to the phone which was found on the bench? When I walk my dog, I hold the lead in one hand and phone in the other if I am on it. When I sit down on a bench whilst I'm on a call, and let the dog off the lead, I will have the lead next to me on the bench or in my bag; not on the ground.
Many a time I have had to go to retrieve my dog's ball and in all occasions, I'd never dream of leaving my phone on the bench. Phones are valuable pieces of equipment and it takes a second for someone to walk by and nab it.
Another point, is that if she did go into the river to retrieve the ball, it wouldn't have been done with the thinking, I imagine, that she thought it was so deep that her phone would be damaged so better leave it on the bench. Her coat was pretty thick with pockets so the natural thing would to put the phone in the pocket as opposed to leaving it on the bench isn't it?
4) I'm presuming she was on the Teams call video off, on mute, as none of the people call clearly don't know whats happened to her. If I am on a Teams call, and walking in the park, I will put my video off, and have my phone in either my hand, bag or coat pocket, with headphones in my ears. Talking of which, did she use headphones for Team calls? Where are these?
People don't just vanish like that. Someone somewhere knows something.