- Joined
- Oct 27, 2016
- Messages
- 2,193
- Reaction score
- 9,580
I agree if anything you become more intune.Absolutely!
I agree if anything you become more intune.Absolutely!
IMO that's because they're not investigating a crime, but a missing person, and do not appear to have strong evidence about whether it's because of a deliberate disappearance, an accident, or a crime. Even if a crime, what kind of crime?I don’t even think the Police have setup a crime room for this, seems really odd , no description of the clothes she was wearing or a drawing of how she may of appeared of even a direct phone number to ring if you have information?
In the Channel 5 interview last night Paul Ansell stated he had called NB phone and WhatsApp. He'd received a call from school at 10.45. And then he'd called the police (999) from the car on the way to the river. In the summing up from the show the host laid out the timeline and he stated 10.45 call from school and 11.00 call to Police.
So is this 15 minutes between the school calling PA and him calling police in the car? Does this seem a long time?
I thought the river was 10 mins from their home?
I'd read that NB was seen by someone who knew her at 08.43 (and this was at a distance. I think this was reported elsewhere as from one field to another) and it was their dogs had interacted. Not that the two people had spoken. That happens to me with my dogs. I can see walkers at a distance and dogs meet but their humans remain at a distance. So perhaps a similar coat and the same dog is a possibility.The first interaction was with a regular dogwalker ,she said they had a short conversation .
The first interaction was with a regular dogwalker who sad
Muxt complying with your request to sat the first too interact was a regular who knew Nicola so. Her testimony
The first interaction was with a regular . I doubt she would have mistaken who she was ta
I doubt very much the lady she had the interaction with Would mistake.
The lady who met her would not have. Mistaken her identity. She knew her
I think this is also a possibility, look at Alice Byrne who went missing last year on New Year's Day. I think slightly different given she went missing right by the coast in Edinburgh but no body has been found/recovered in that case and I think they have now concluded all lines of enquiry on the basis that they believe she entered the water.The sad fact is that many missing people turn up in water weeks or even months after having entered it, sometimes at great distances from where they are assumed to have entered it. Isn’t it simply too early to say that she’s not in the water?
I don’t think it has AFAIK.Not sure. I wasn’t sure if it has been stated who the text message exchange about the play date was with.
Clearly LE is confident NB is not in the river stretch they were searching. That’s why they stopped.I haven’t seen anything today at all - very quiet and very worrying.
Gosh I did not know about Alice and I live quite nearby …what a shame… I’ll t have to look into this. Thanks for bringing it up.I think this is also a possibility, look at Alice Byrne who went missing last year on New Year's Day. I think slightly different given she went missing right by the coast in Edinburgh but no body has been found/recovered in that case and I think they have now concluded all lines of enquiry on the basis that they believe she entered the water.
Barkingky alarmingly? Yes, they certainly would.Would anyone react to the sound of a dog barking coming from an area used by dog walkers?
A local friend.Has it been stated who the text message was sent to about the play date?
But you wouldn’t freeze while being walked 10 minutes with dog walkers nearby On open ground in broad daylight.Agree. Oh, and the responses are not just 'fight or flight' as people assume - it's fight, flight or freeze.
If these photo's of NB - posted to show her and what she was wearing on the morning she disappeared - are not genuine, then, given the police attitude to this disappearance, the poster would be in police custody by now and all the photo's deleted.Playing Devil's advocate on that question but how do we know they were taken that morning. No time stamps on versions I've seen. I'm not saying that it isn't NB btw.
Normally when things are quiet, it means that some significant work is going on in the background! Let’s hope so anyway. We are inclined to expect daily if not hourly updates on things these days - conditioned by social media mechanisms - and find the reverse suspicious. Hopefully they’re working away productively.I haven’t seen anything today at all - very quiet and very worrying.
Yes but they were originally shared by a family friend and then the police put them on after I believe. IMO.
Would that be unlikely given they had spoken F2F moments before? And EW would have mentioned that they had exchanged texts I would imagine.Not sure. I wasn’t sure if it has been stated who the text message exchange about the play date was with. Is she her best friend? They live about 3.2 miles apart by the looks of it.
I agree, it was a contradiction on channel 5 and one I noticed- which is weird as why would you say that knowing on the day that’s not what happened?To me the doorbell images have always looked like NB but I am still confused by PA'S description of him loading up the car when it was clearly NB doing so in those last images.
Who called the school to notify them?I don’t see how 5 minutes would be significant, I doubt he knew the exact time he left or arrived at the walk area. I believe he did say in the interview that he was in his gym outfit, maybe he changed. I’m not sure you can accurately measure the time of a journey like this either. Sometimes the roads are clear, sometimes you’re behind a couple of cars at a junction.
MOO