ayrshireguy
Former Member
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2023
- Messages
- 471
- Reaction score
- 2,579
And search dogs can make mistakes too. They missed the body of five year old Lizzy Shelly, found in the same area they had searched days earlier.What makes you think they didn't?
![]()
Dog squad from Cumbria Police joins search for missing woman
THE Cumbria Police dog section has been providing assistance in Lancashire to help locate missing woman Nicola Bulley.www.thewestmorlandgazette.co.uk
Yes, and this goes back to a previous comment about interpreting things police say.I've noticed police never say 'suspected suicide', self-harm, nothing like that at all. They will say 'foul play is not suspected.' IMO, it's for the family to publicize, if they choose.
'Accident' meant 'no foul play' in this case, IMO. They later revealed NB had 'vulnerabilities', another code word, but never said 'possible prone to suicide'.
JMO
I want to hear what he says ( presuming TV, then picked up by papers.)I noticed he said his thoughts are with the family, I hope now he shuts his mouth and doesn't even bother with an excuse. If he dares to appear on TV again about this case in the coming days, I will end up throwing something at my TV and smashing it......
I hope to God that in view of the appalling behaviour of certain areas of Social Media that an extremely wide and I mean WIDE police cordon is thrown around that whole area keeping absolutely everyone out that shouldn't be there. Possibly if I was running things I'm afraid I would be saying (in view of the media attention) that the body stays in the water under the watchful eye of a police diver and is only recovered in the very late hours of this evening or the very very early hours of morning before any sunrise. I say this for reasons of the privacy and dignity of the deceased.
wowSorry to tell you:
“Rawcliffe Road was closed for several hours on Sunday so that the body could be recovered and removed. As soon as it reopened, a steady stream of local people and crime scene tourists visited the spot, after seeing photographs of the search on social media.”
![]()
Body found in search for missing woman Nicola Bulley, say police
Mortgage adviser, 45, went missing while walking her pet after dropping off daughters at schoolwww.theguardian.com
What is wrong with people!Sorry to tell you:
“Rawcliffe Road was closed for several hours on Sunday so that the body could be recovered and removed. As soon as it reopened, a steady stream of local people and crime scene tourists visited the spot, after seeing photographs of the search on social media.”
![]()
Body found in search for missing woman Nicola Bulley, say police
Mortgage adviser, 45, went missing while walking her pet after dropping off daughters at schoolwww.theguardian.com
Thanks for posting this reminder of just what he said (or one of the things he's said!). "Eliminate this river". That statement was outrageous. Never in the history of river searches has anyone ever maintained that they could 'eliminate it'. No flipping wonder things got as crazy as they did, after they didn't find her.he said he searched downstream from the weir in the clip which I uploaded many days ago
![]()
UK - Nicola Bulley, St Michaels on Wyre (Lancashire), Jan 27, 2023 *MEDIA, MAPS, & TIMELINES - NO DISCUSSION*
https://www.lep.co.uk/news/crime/nicola-bulleys-friend-shares-11-facts-to-set-the-record-straight-about-missing-mums-disappearance-4014566www.websleuths.com
6th feb clip
Now the thread has to be updated, I think.Sorry to tell you:
“Rawcliffe Road was closed for several hours on Sunday so that the body could be recovered and removed. As soon as it reopened, a steady stream of local people and crime scene tourists visited the spot, after seeing photographs of the search on social media.”
![]()
Body found in search for missing woman Nicola Bulley, say police
Mortgage adviser, 45, went missing while walking her pet after dropping off daughters at schoolwww.theguardian.com
Thanks for your previous post which I was unable to reply to as the thread closed. ( I hadn't appreciated that MWT was the link for PF's later involvement)Thanks for posting this reminder of just what he said (or one of the things he's said!). "Eliminate this river". That statement was outrageous. Never in the history of river searches has anyone ever maintained that they could 'eliminate it'. No flipping wonder things got as crazy as they did, after they didn't find her.
No ID so far as far as I know.Now the thread has to be updated, I think.![]()
I took it as just a statement of fact and more related to the Jan 10th incident and threats by people to attempt to sell salacious gossip to rags. I say "related to the Jan 10th incident" to mean that I wondered if the media would be able to find out about that, and LE simply wanted to explain it before speculation started as to the reason police went to the home.
Sometimes a piece of information might be indicative of something, but first of all it's just a piece of information no different from a piece of information such as the clothing someone was wearing when they were last seen.
I'm not sure if we're disagreeing or agreeing, but where we differ, I think, is that I said that I believe police wouldn't have put forward a proposition about an accident with the harness/dog if they suspected it was intentional. They'd have been more neutral.I've noticed police never say 'suspected suicide', self-harm, nothing like that at all. They will say 'foul play is not suspected.' IMO, it's for the family to publicize, if they choose.
'Accident' meant 'no foul play' in this case, IMO. They later revealed NB had 'vulnerabilities', another code word, but never said 'possible prone to suicide'.
JMO
True. Police just state the facts. I think they do use those facts in order to generate 'possible scenarios', which lead them to search for evidence that might confirm or discount that possible scenario. But they're trained to do this.Yes, and this goes back to a previous comment about interpreting things police say.
When they say a missing person has been suffering from mental health issues or depression, they aren't telling us it's likely suicide. They are just telling us a piece of information. It's 'we' who interpret it as meaning potential suicide, they aren't telling us what to think, we decide what to think, what to make of the information.
So if they say someone was having some issues with alcohol or anything else, they're just giving a piece of information. They're not telling us to judge the person based on that piece of information, they're not telling us what conclusions to draw from the information.We might judge or draw conclusions, but isn't that on us?
Who was that quoted, please?Now the thread has to be updated, I think.![]()