- Joined
- Nov 23, 2020
- Messages
- 3,538
- Reaction score
- 19,992
If you mean this line then the prosecution didn't say she was suspected of deliberately harming them. They said:
“By this time Lucy Letby was supposed only to be working day shifts because the consultants were concerned about the correlation between her presence and unexpected deaths and life-threatening episodes on the night shifts.
Did they actually think she was deliberately harming babies at that point? Or did they just think that she was incompetent, lacking confidence, slacking, in need of more support or supervision? This is why I'd like to hear more.
![]()
Lucy Letby: what has the court heard so far in trial of Hereford nurse?
A HEREFORD nurse was allegedly interrupted by the mother of a victim as she attacked the baby in the neo-natal unit of the hospital where she worked.www.herefordtimes.com
Regardless of what they specifically thought, they clearly suspected that she had something to do with harming patients, whether or not intentionally, so moved her to test their theory. That's unconscionable, quite honestly - it's equivalent to running a dangerous medical trial without telling people they are being experimented on!
If you suspect that someone may be harming patients then you address the potential problem - by at the very least having them chaperoned hut preferably removed from the front line - until you know what you're dealing with.