We're now moving to interview summaries for Child J - a baby girl who it is claimed Ms Letby attempted to murder on 27 November 2015.
11:21 AM · Apr 25, 2023
[The above Tweet has now been deleted from Twitter.]
which evidence seemingly points to her not cottoning onto suspicion about her?A few people have mentioned that they question how intelligent the defendant is. I’m still finding that difficult to gauge but I haven’t seen anything to suggest anything way above average. Seemingly not smart enough to cotton on to the suspicion about her.
But please don't leave the country gentlemen, as we may need to ask you further questions.Good to know.
And that we can now eliminate Smudge and Tigger from our enquiries.![]()
Even the oddness? I think she’s a little more than average odd lol. I agree btw proper average in so many ways. so Tame though, I can see her being the kind to hoard teddy bears or those Beenie bear things. I couldn’t think of a more average thing for her generation and age than that picture on her wall saying “shine bright like a diamond“. Rihanna lyric. I’m really not at all seeing anything way above average smarts from her. Not socially either. She’s social but not socially smart for instance I haven’t seen anything from her that shows she has an insight to the human mind that allows her to dictate where an interaction is going, otherwise known as “witchy” and that’s coming from someone who is known to be witchy as merlin himself. I don’t think she’s cunning at all, if she’s guilty she’s plain opportunistic. One of the ways the prosecution have been able to place her near the scene is her writing in the notes about things administered, if she was cunning and guilty she simply wouldn’t have put herself at the scene Like that. Especially unnecessarily when attending to others babies. That’s incriminating if guilty, not cunning. im not sure if people are making mountains out of molehills in regards to very isolated examples of debatably immoral behaviour.I agree. I think she seems very average in every way. It's why this is all so hard to believe I guess. JMO.
Dr j and baby k. If she was guilty that interaction would have been enough to raise her own alarm bells. he walks in “what are you doing” that’s very blunt and points in one direction.which evidence seemingly points to her not cottoning onto suspicion about her?
what about changes in alleged methods of attack?
what about significant gaps in the timeline of alleged attacks at points when consultants asked for external investigations?
to name just part of the evidence
She's clearly reasonably intelligent as she's relatively high banded for someone who was 25 at the time and was looking to become band 6 so has progressed fairly rapidly. She also seems to be able to handle herself pretty well in police interviews which tends to make me think that she's not quite the shy, clumsy person she seems to be being painted as.A few people have mentioned that they question how intelligent the defendant is. I’m still finding that difficult to gauge but I haven’t seen anything to suggest anything way above average. Seemingly not smart enough to cotton on to the suspicion about her.
I agree that she comes across as very average. Quite basic in fact.
But if guilty, then I would say this is the image she wants to give off, and that's how she wants people to see her.
The discrepancies in her notes in some of the cases do point to a cunning nature and trying to cover her back, but I still wouldn't say she's super intelligent. And I also think the famous notes appear to show that she may not be as normal as she's wanting to portray, but as it's been pointed out, we're not totally sure when they were written so that could play a part. JMO.
Those weren't Dr J's words that you''ve got in quotes. He testified he asked what was going on and that LL replied 'she's just started desaturating now'. He didn't point at her.Dr j and baby k. If she was guilty that interaction would have been enough to raise her own alarm bells. he walks in “what are you doing” that’s very blunt and points in one direction.
then the nurse who asked her how she could see that the child was pale. from the POV of a murderer she didn’t need to point out what was wrong with the babs. if she was guilty she incriminated herself there.
it’s also only towards the end of the charges that she shows awareness of how the deaths reflect on her, I think if she was guilty she would have tried to approach someone to feign innocence before that by a long way. As in expressed concern to a manager as an attempt to show she was a dutiful and caring nurse.
there’s no evidence to suggest she scanned for warning signs at all.
what about changes in alleged methods? It’s certainly not cunning to leave physical wounds when the AE seemed to be undetectable at first glance. It’s also particularly incriminating to get back off holiday and start smashing your way through the cribs. Not cunning at all.
im not aware of the gaps in alleged attacks after requests for external investigations?
So is she admitting here that she made this note in diary at the time of event rather than as has been mulled over here to make a timeline of events after she was moved to clerical duties.
Among the items seized by police was also Ms Letby's diary, on 8 April 2016 is written: "LD [long day] twins". The following day is written: "LD twins resus" Ms Letby was asked why she had logged this - she said it was because it was a 'significant event'
12:47 PM · Apr 25, 2023
RSBMAmong the items seized by police was also Ms Letby's diary, on 8 April 2016 is written: "LD [long day] twins". The following day is written: "LD twins resus" Ms Letby was asked why she had logged this - she said it was because it was a 'significant event'
12:47 PM · Apr 25, 2023