UK - Nurse Lucy Letby, Faces 22 Charges - 7 Murder/15 Attempted Murder of Babies #24

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #1,101
Has anyone read anything about who is up next on Wednesday?
All I’ve seen so far is from the Chester Standard, saying there may be further evidence from the defence…not sure what that means, or if it’s just not worded very well.

 
  • #1,102
Things come apart so easily when they have been held together with lies. (D. Allison)
And the lies fell apart like stitches from a sloppy knitter, reading the prosecution was fantastic Nic Johnson KC is superb, as are his team behind him.
 
  • #1,103
Poor Lucy being arrested in her nightdress at 6am, being isolated from her ‘family’ at the hospital and terrified for her future because of the big bad doctors conspiring to scapegoat her for their mistakes.
The nightdress that haunted her at night, that was so strongly associated with the knock at the door. The same nightdress and door knock that caused PTSD causing these episodes of being startled and profound memory loss. .
Wait a minute... Leisure suit?
 
  • #1,104
The nightdress that haunted her at night, that was so strongly associated with the knock at the door. The same nightdress and door knock that caused PTSD causing these episodes of being startled and profound memory loss. .
Wait a minute... Leisure suit?
That PTSD that meant court had to break or adjourn every time she was asked a challenging question…..
 
  • #1,105
Things come apart so easily when they have been held together with lies. (D. Allison)
And the lies fell apart like stitches from a sloppy knitter, reading the prosecution was fantastic Nic Johnson KC is superb, as are his team behind him.
Colossal, titanic effort from:

Consultants and other Medical and Health Care staff, Experts, LE and Prosecution.

Respect!

JMO
 
  • #1,106
Colossal, titanic effort from:

Consultants and other Medical and Health Care staff, Experts, LE and Prosecution.

Respect!

JMO
I thought breary and jaraym must have had an excellent briefing with the prosecution.
I noted how when recalling events DR SB described Dr RJ's actions and Dr RJ described Dr SB's in relation to how events unfolded.

That left Myers zero room for manoeuvre, he was jammed between two consistent stories in reverse effect; the fact they described each others others actions so consistently left him nowhere to go.
 
  • #1,107
<modsnip: quoted post was removed> Their relationship is part and parcel of what happened. All part of being on the truth train. You can't have a trial with huge holes leaving the jury guessing, where it can be avoided.

Why did Letby have such a massive reaction and try to leave the dock when he gave evidence? Could it be because he thought doctors were blaming her unfairly (his message to her saying he would give a statement for her at any time) and he's not allowed to say?

Why did he send her confidential emails? Was it because he was rational and had good judgement, or was it because he was thinking irrationally and had zero objectivity?

Why was his name plastered all over her notes? How can we tell if she's lying about a relationship if the prosecution found no evidence of it and doesn't bring it in?

Why didn't she throw him under the bus with everyone else? Again, was it because she said he was her friend for so long after her removal, and so she can't say now he was conspiring, so does that mean there is some truth to the doctors' conspiracy, etc

Why would she lie about him being her boyfriend? Ah ok, he's married, so maybe that makes her honourable trying to protect him, or is it that she feels she will be judged poorly for her part in that? Did she ever tell her parents about him, and about him being married, and they're watching in court? etc

MOO
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #1,108
Did @C2C go today? I really hope so!
 
  • #1,109
On one occasion Letby went to London with the doctor, and was due to go a second time before the trip was cancelled.

He had sent a message to her ending with a large red heart emoji.

Mr Johnson asked her to read it aloud, but then had to prompt her twice before she finally referred to the emoji. 'It's a heart,' she told him.

Letby had responded to the doctor's love heart with one of her own, combined with a smiling face emoji.

'It's a smiley face and a heart,' she said.

Mr Johnson asked: 'But he wasn't your boyfriend?'

Letby replied: 'It's not a relationship at all. It's a friendship'.


 
  • #1,110
Imo it seems she was even more happy with him after she had been redeployed...she hadn't lost her job ..she had her house ...if you had done nothing wrong no way would you be thinking "ill never marry or have kids"
 
  • #1,111
It's always interesting to hear your thoughts, but I would hate you to have a wasted journey if it's cancelled again.
I have just got home from the court....My god......
I didn't stick around for Mr Myers part in the afternoon.

I will write up a report later but I have to get this out here now.
I am not sure if this is in the writing but Johnson was asking Letby to spell the name of one of the babies mothers and when Johnson said "It is quite a difficult name isn't it" Lucy SNAPPED at him YES whilst giving him a incredibly angry sideways glance ! This only lasted a fraction of a second but it was like a totally different person came out in that moment.

The only way I can describe it is when someone is asking you something and they can't hear you, so you reply yes...yes....YES!!

It was like the mask slipped for a brief second.
 
  • #1,112
Liz Hull
@lizhull
·
8h

Stand-by for a bonus episode of @LucyLetbyTrial podcast with myself and @RadioCaroline_ this evening, where we discuss the neo-natal nurse’s alleged ‘crush’ on Dr A

Caroline Cheetham
@RadioCaroline_
·
45m

Busy day in court today @LucyLetbyTrial so the finishing touches are just being made to the extra episode
@lizhull and I have just finished recording for you. We’ll be out shortly to bring you up to date. Episode 38 Dr A.


Episode 38, Dr. A​




In this bonus episode Caroline and Liz take a closer look at what Lucy Letby says about her relationship with Dr A.

They examine how it’s alleged she attacked and murdered babies on the neo-natal unit - to get his attention because she had a ‘crush’ on him.
 
  • #1,113
Liz Hull
@lizhull
·
8h

Stand-by for a bonus episode of @LucyLetbyTrial podcast with myself and @RadioCaroline_ this evening, where we discuss the neo-natal nurse’s alleged ‘crush’ on Dr A

Caroline Cheetham
@RadioCaroline_
·
45m

Busy day in court today @LucyLetbyTrial so the finishing touches are just being made to the extra episode
@lizhull and I have just finished recording for you. We’ll be out shortly to bring you up to date. Episode 38 Dr A.


Episode 38, Dr. A​




In this bonus episode Caroline and Liz take a closer look at what Lucy Letby says about her relationship with Dr A.

They examine how it’s alleged she attacked and murdered babies on the neo-natal unit - to get his attention because she had a ‘crush’ on him.
The Milkybar Kid has had his hands firmly caught in the cookie jar JMO
 
  • #1,114
I don’t know much about court room proceeding but are you allowed to just make assertions without any substantiating evidence?

- ‘gang of four’ discrimination - evidence?
- ‘raw sewage on ward and sinks’- evidence?
- ‘ptsd’ - evidence - or is this self diagnosed?
- ‘babies frequently crash’ - evidence?
- ‘I collect paper’ - evidence? Don’t see half of (named brand) stationers in her house!!!

Is this normal for someone to make these statements without providing any facts or proof? Particularly around the clinical issues as lay people will have no idea. Would be useful to have these confirmed or refuted by a medical expert.
 
Last edited:
  • #1,115
I don’t know much about court room proceeding but are you allowed to just make assertions without any substantiating evidence?

- ‘gang of four’ discrimination - evidence?
- ‘raw sewage on ward and sinks’- evidence?
- ‘ptsd’ - evidence - or is this self diagnosed?
- ‘babies frequently crash’ - evidence?
- ‘I collect paper’ - evidence? Don’t see half of Ryman stationers in her house!!!

Is this normal for someone to make these statements without providing any facts or proof? Particularly around the clinical issues as lay people will have no idea. Would be useful to have these confirmed or refuted by a medical expert.
She's the defendant, she can say anything she likes in her defence - regardless of how ridiculous it may, or may not, be.
 
  • #1,116
The podcast is out. Not much we haven’t heard, but a little bit more info on her meet ups with Doc Choc, and they confirmed that she was talking about him when she apparently slipped up and admitted she had a boyfriend.
 
  • #1,117
She's the defendant, she can say anything she likes in her defence - regardless of how ridiculous it may, or may not, be.
Interesting, Thanks !
 
  • #1,118
  • #1,119
I have just got home from the court....My god......
I didn't stick around for Mr Myers part in the afternoon.

I will write up a report later but I have to get this out here now.
I am not sure if this is in the writing but Johnson was asking Letby to spell the name of one of the babies mothers and when Johnson said "It is quite a difficult name isn't it" Lucy SNAPPED at him YES whilst giving him a incredibly angry sideways glance ! This only lasted a fraction of a second but it was like a totally different person came out in that moment.

The only way I can describe it is when someone is asking you something and they can't hear you, so you reply yes...yes....YES!!

It was like the mask slipped for a brief second.
Omg, you must be shattered!

They did report on spelling the name out, but not the snapping part.

Look forward to hearing more later.
 
  • #1,120
<modsnip: quoted post was removed> The married man/affair revelation is not about him though, it's about her. The prosecution's remit was to paint a pic of LL that challenged in every possible way the pic she painted of herself. DrChoc has been reduced, unfortunately for him, to collateral damage.

Is it harsh that his affair is now in the public domain? Yes, I think it is. Their affair was their business (no judgement from me here) and were it not for her turning out to be an alleged <modsnip: violates sub judice> killer, it would have remained so and no one would have been any the wiser.

There's a lesson there somewhere although I'm not sure what it is...

Anyway, I'm still on my fence. It's not over till it's over.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
117
Guests online
2,326
Total visitors
2,443

Forum statistics

Threads
632,813
Messages
18,632,037
Members
243,303
Latest member
jresner5
Back
Top