- Joined
- Oct 27, 2022
- Messages
- 15
- Reaction score
- 105
https://twitter.com/MrDanDonoghue
Court told that Child G was cannulated, behind a screen, and placed on a Masimo monitor - a portable device attached to the patient by a sensor that continually measures oxygen saturations and heart rate levels.
After the doctors had gone, but Child G was still screened, the nurse told the court that she heard Ms Letby shouting for help. She said she responded, Ms Letby was using neopuff on the infant - who 'did not look very well at all'
She noticed that the monitor screen was black and had been switched off.
The nurse said this was not normal procedure (for the monitor to be off)
The nurse however has told the court that she asked to review her original statement to police last month - as she said she had seen in the prosecution opening that there was a suggestion Ms Letby had turned the monitor off - she said 'I knew that not to be the case'
She tells the court that on 21 September two doctors came her to apologise, as they had left the screen in situ and not switched the monitor back on
That's certainly a win for the defence there, it wasn't Lucy who turned the monitor off. I wonder how the jury are weighing the evidence for baby G.
The cross examination of the consultants to me gives me little doubt that the poor baby was deliberately overfed. From the snippets we have, the questions from the defence and the responses from the consultant doctors actually really emphasised that point.
MOO.