UK - Prince Andrew accused of underage sexual relationship, 1999-2002 *settled* #2

  • #1,121
Any future "help" will still have to be deeply respectful of "sir".
 
  • #1,122
This is long overdue. Will he be taking his horses with him so he can continue to ride?

This might also be a bit of a shot across H& M’s bow. Behave or you will lose your titles as well.
 
  • #1,123
I’m in the midst of listening to the audiobook of Virginia Giuffre’s book “Nobody’s Child.” It’s an unbelievably sickening story.

If Charles believes Andrew is guilty, why let him live anywhere in any royal property? This is like, “Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain!”
 
  • #1,124
Ha ha, some of the comments after that post are hilarious 😂.
 
  • #1,125
I’m in the midst of listening to the audiobook of Virginia Giuffre’s book “Nobody’s Child.” It’s an unbelievably sickening story.

If Charles believes Andrew is guilty, why let him live anywhere in any royal property? This is like, “Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain!”

Agree! What kind of cut-off from the family is that? It makes Charles look weak. Maybe he is thinking that if he kicks Andrew out it will create a media storm. Highly likely that Andrew would have made his house hunting a dramatic showdown.
 
  • #1,126

'ITV has severed ties with Sarah Ferguson, is she about to lose her book deal too?'​


snip:

"The Duchess was a real hit with ITV bosses on Loose Women, everyone thought she was a natural," a source was quoted as saying at the time. "There is an open invitation for her to return to Loose Women and there is also talk of her doing a guest slot on This Morning or a mini-series for them."


A mini-series never materialised and amid the ongoing scrutiny surrounding Sarah and Prince Andrew due to their links with Jeffrey Epstein, further ITV projects are no longer on the cards, nor would she likely be welcomed back by her former Loose Women co-stars.'

cont
 
  • #1,127
Well, Andrew will just have to get used to his new home. The Queen's corgis and a couple of horses can keep him company. He probably won't get to see much of his grandchildren. But I do wonder how he'll manage for help around the house? Meals on Wheels perhaps? And a cleaning lady. That should be all he needs.

I'm sure the new house comes with staff.
But it looks like an exile.
Far from madding crowds of the capital hehehe
 
  • #1,128
For once, the French and the Russians had the right idea. :)
 
  • #1,129
Agree! What kind of cut-off from the family is that? It makes Charles look weak. Maybe he is thinking that if he kicks Andrew out it will create a media storm. Highly likely that Andrew would have made his house hunting a dramatic showdown.
I actually think that it was probably the best of a limited choice of options they had.
Given his unpopularity and also some of the things he could know about other elite people who were involved with Epstein ,Andrew could be a target . I really don't think he could be housed in an ordinary street ,the disturbance to the neighbours and other locals could be high due to press and other intrusion.
I agree with everything that has been written about him ,but he has been publicly humiliated and lost everything he valued. I would not expect all family members to completely cut him off on a personal level. Having him somewhere on their own privately owned land will let him live out of the public gaze ,but allow family visits to be done away from any press.
I wish the same amount of press attention ,public revulsion and government co operation could be given to the historic and on going grooming and rape of young vulnerable girls.
 
  • #1,130
  • #1,131
Agree! What kind of cut-off from the family is that? It makes Charles look weak. Maybe he is thinking that if he kicks Andrew out it will create a media storm. Highly likely that Andrew would have made his house hunting a dramatic showdown.
To be honest he is getting a heck of a lot of support for doing it.
 
  • #1,132
I actually think that it was probably the best of a limited choice of options they had.
Given his unpopularity and also some of the things he could know about other elite people who were involved with Epstein ,Andrew could be a target . I really don't think he could be housed in an ordinary street ,the disturbance to the neighbours and other locals could be high due to press and other intrusion.
I agree with everything that has been written about him ,but he has been publicly humiliated and lost everything he valued. I would not expect all family members to completely cut him off on a personal level. Having him somewhere on their own privately owned land will let him live out of the public gaze ,but allow family visits to be done away from any press.
I wish the same amount of press attention ,public revulsion and government co operation could be given to the historic and on going grooming and rape of young vulnerable girls.
IMO they are just trying to cover that up :(
 
  • #1,133

Gardens House​

Another option could be to rent Gardens House to the former prince. The building which once housed the estate’s head gardener was put on the market as a holiday let this summer. It has six bedrooms and already has one review which declares it to be “very well presented”.


 

Attachments

  • IMG_0016.webp
    IMG_0016.webp
    343.1 KB · Views: 1
  • #1,134
IMO they are just trying to cover that up :(
I totally agree. It is an absolute scandal and should be headlines in every paper . To me it is far worse than Epstein especially as it is still on going .
 
  • #1,135
He could end up in disgraced overseas exile like Great Uncle Herr Edward VIII? I believe the UAE is a possibility, as Mr Mountbatten Saxe-Coburg Gotha Windsor has property there iirc.
 
  • #1,136
Last edited:
  • #1,137
I totally agree. It is an absolute scandal and should be headlines in every paper . To me it is far worse than Epstein especially as it is still on going .
A Peterborough councillor called them girls "poor white trash" which is just disgusting. Yes I agree :(
 
  • #1,138
  • #1,139
As I have stated before I totally agree with what has been said about Andrew and the totally agree with the actions taken by the Royal family . In my opinion though I think this now is in danger of becoming a witch hunt ,motivated by people with their own agenda of wishing to destroy the whole royal family rather than issue of young women being sexually exploited.
 
  • #1,140
I think it is something different.

When certain issues/problems
are not dealt with at proper time
(like immediately)
they tend to fester
and suddenly blow up spectacularly.

Like in case of gangrene -
cut it off immediately
or it will end in fatal sepsis of the whole body.
Oops, I'm not a medic,
but even I realize it :rolleyes:

"Stitch in time saves nine"
Right?

Of course right.

JMO
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
78
Guests online
1,459
Total visitors
1,537

Forum statistics

Threads
635,407
Messages
18,675,763
Members
243,214
Latest member
MissingPerson
Back
Top