- Joined
- Jan 23, 2021
- Messages
- 17,003
- Reaction score
- 104,948
Last edited:
I agree the king can do what he likes in providing for his brother. It just seems to me that Charles is not doing enough because he is simply moving Andrew from one public home for the royal family to one private home also for the royal family. I don't see that as a negative consequence for Andrew. I get it that Andrew might have difficulty living away from Royal family properties due to security issues, but why doesn't Charles cut the strings entirely. That would be good optics IMO.Andrew has not been charged with any crime.
If the King wants to keep him in a home on private property, that’s up to him & Andrew.
I do think that the other Royals are very aware that this anti Monarchist movement could affect them, so optics and getting off ‘public owned property’ is a must if they wish to keep the ball rolling.
My question is, once Charles dies, will William be willing to have his uncle stay onsite?
You mean Prince Andrew right?As the auditing continues, it seems likely that Prince Edward has been paying peppercorn rent (free loading) since 2007.
I bet Charles is having a fit over this ongoing auditing.
The cat is out of the bag now.
How can the Monarchy continue once the public knows the true cost of keeping these millionaires/billionaires in the lap of luxury?
![]()
Andrew's banishment is attempt to save monarchy from bigger scandal
So, Andrew has been exiled to the far reaches of the solar system, or as near as King Charles could manage - the depths of the Sandringham estate in Norfolk.www.dailymail.co.uk
You mean Prince Andrew right?
ETA: Actually, just Andrew now.
The monarchy actually does not cost the taxpayer very much. They bring in a huge revenue which offsets many of the costs. The working royals do an enormous amount of work for charity and good causes . Other countries have Presidents who also have luxurious places to live and cost the country money.As the auditing continues, it seems likely that Prince Edward has been paying peppercorn rent (free loading) since 2007.
I bet Charles is having a fit over this ongoing auditing.
The cat is out of the bag now.
How can the Monarchy continue once the public knows the true cost of keeping these millionaires/billionaires in the lap of luxury?
![]()
Andrew's banishment is attempt to save monarchy from bigger scandal
So, Andrew has been exiled to the far reaches of the solar system, or as near as King Charles could manage - the depths of the Sandringham estate in Norfolk.www.dailymail.co.uk
The monarchy actually does not cost the taxpayer very much. They bring in a huge revenue which offsets many of the costs. The working royals do an enormous amount of work for charity and good causes . Other countries have Presidents who also have luxurious places to live and cost the country money.
Surely you meant Princess Edward?No, I mean Prince Edward.
Some do, e.g. to see Changing of the Guards, I mean from overseas.Tourists do not come to see the Royals, that’s a bunch of baloney.
That's if it is true tbh. I saw another article and that didn't suggest it was a peppercorn rateAs the auditing continues, it seems likely that Prince Edward has been paying peppercorn rent (free loading) since 2007.
I bet Charles is having a fit over this ongoing auditing.
The cat is out of the bag now.
How can the Monarchy continue once the public knows the true cost of keeping these millionaires/billionaires in the lap of luxury?
![]()
Andrew's banishment is attempt to save monarchy from bigger scandal
So, Andrew has been exiled to the far reaches of the solar system, or as near as King Charles could manage - the depths of the Sandringham estate in Norfolk.www.dailymail.co.uk
Yes tourists do come to see the RoyalsSorry but I couldn’t disagree more.
They cost the taxpayers a ‘Kings ransom’.
That’s why Charles is running scared.
Tourists do not come to see the Royals.
Don't they cost each person like £1 a year ?The monarchy actually does not cost the taxpayer very much. They bring in a huge revenue which offsets many of the costs. The working royals do an enormous amount of work for charity and good causes . Other countries have Presidents who also have luxurious places to live and cost the country money.
Whenever there's a big event and the reporters go around the crowds it's full of tourists who have come for the occasionSome do, e.g. to see Changing of the Guards, I mean from overseas.
Then there is tourism within the UK e.g. the loyal subjects heading to London for some event or other. Probably brings in a bit of money.
How many tourists come to see the Royals, I do not know, but definitely more than none.
JMO
Gardens House
Another option could be to rent Gardens House to the former prince. The building which once housed the estate’s head gardener was put on the market as a holiday let this summer. It has six bedrooms and already has one review which declares it to be “very well presented”.
![]()
Sandringham head gardener's home becomes holiday let
The Gardens House, once the home of the royal estate's head gardener, can be rented for £4K a week.www.bbc.com