UK - Prince Andrew accused of underage sexual relationship, 1999-2002 *settled* #2

[Dotta]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1980338297978101811

 

[otto]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1980338297978101811

When one party is suing another party, isn't it normal legal practice for both parties to try to dig up dirt on each other? I'm not convinced that Andrew's legal response to a lawsuit is all that unusual.

 

[JDG]

When one party is suing another party, isn't it normal legal practice for both parties to try to dig up dirt on each other? I'm not convinced that Andrew's legal response to a lawsuit is all that unusual.

And, is it illegal to ASK if they can check out the other party??

Wouldn’t it only be illegal if an officer checked for information against the regulations and how would that be Prince Andrew’s fault?

IMO, one should able to ask for information, it’s up to the authorities to decline.

 

[JDG]

Some of the papers are trying to put different spins on this story just to increase their revenue.

The DM often does this with a money maker, rightly or wrongly.

IMO, MOO etc.

 

[tedtink]

When one party is suing another party, isn't it normal legal practice for both parties to try to dig up dirt on each other? I'm not convinced that Andrew's legal response to a lawsuit is all that unusual.

There was no lawsuit in 2011.
PR instructed a tax payer funded bodyguard to investigate VG two days before the photo of them together was published in 2011.
VG sued PR in 2021.

Access Restricted

 

[Inthedetails]

There was no lawsuit in 2011.
PR instructed a tax payer funded bodyguard to investigate VG two days before the photo of them together was published in 2011.
VG sued PR in 2021.

Access Restricted

Andrew lost his honors, but I'm bestowing Timeline Superkeeper on you. It's official.

jmopinion

 

[tedtink]

Andrew lost his honors, but I'm bestowing Timeline Superkeeper on you. It's official.

jmopinion

No sweat